Re: Client POC from Holger Knublauch on 2015-11-10 (public-hydra@w3.org from November 2015)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:04:35 +1000
To: public-hydra@w3.org
Message-ID: <56415EC3.8090705@topquadrant.com>

On 11/10/2015 6:50, Karol Szczepański wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>>> - class description in general uses OWL restrictions on properties - 
>>> not very convinient
>> I hope that SHACL can be used for this in the future.
> I hope so. I'm just wondering how to have Hydra + SHACL working 
> together without confusing the client (hydra:Class, 
> hydra:SupportedProperty, rdf:Property, schacl:Shape, etc.)

One option is to declare hydra:Class rdfs:subClassOf sh:Shape. Then you 
can use sh:property etc directly at the hydra:Classes. (Unless my 
currently proposed solution to ISSUE-23 gets shot down by the WG).

Holger

Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2015 03:05:09 UTC