- From: mca <mca@amundsen.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:43:09 -0400
- To: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
- Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 12:43:37 UTC
LOL! Last line was directed to Dietrich ;) Cheers! On Mar 21, 2015 1:37 PM, "mca" <mca@amundsen.com> wrote: > Hmm... A bit of a cross between a schema and a WSDL. Good for getting > details of a single implementation, but the reliance on cardinality and > enumerated types, etc. limits wide use beyond a single service > implementation. > > Wonder if this is expected to be used at design-time or runtime? > > Could be a decent compliment to ALPS. > > Great to spend time with you this week, too. > > Cheers. > On Mar 21, 2015 11:38 AM, "Dietrich Schulten" <ds@escalon.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The RDF shapes group has published a draft [1] and a primer [2] of a >> vocabulary which expresses value constraints. Markus has expressed the >> hope that this could be used with hydra:supportedProperty, so this is >> going to be interesting: >> >> [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ >> [2] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-primer/ >> >> Best regards, >> Dietrich >> >>
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 12:43:37 UTC