- From: Andrew Hacking <ahacking@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 21:08:54 +1000
- To: carmen <_@whats-your.name>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 7 March 2015 11:09:22 UTC
Carmen, If you take the time to read all of the prior threads on collections and paging you will see I have carefully articulated use cases and requirements. You demonstrate your ignorance with your reply so I see no reason to dignify it further. Instead of being so smug, use your intelligence, read the threads, and try to understand why your proposal would have poor characteristics for your typical infinite scroll use case. Try and understand why serial access (as opposed to random access) may not be ideal and how that would hurt performance and bandwidth utilization. You may actually grasp some sense of the naivety embodied in the proposals. On 7 Mar 2015 20:47, "carmen" <_@whats-your.name> wrote: > > Best of luck to you all, I'm done here. > > best of luck to you as well, as youve tried to make an argument without > references and pointers to the solutions you consider superior > > eg, modern "infinite scroll" mobile UIs can be backed by "1990s" next/prev > links underneath? > >
Received on Saturday, 7 March 2015 11:09:22 UTC