- From: Tom Johnson <tom@dp.la>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:10:56 -0700
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>, public-hydra@w3.org
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 07:30:13 UTC
+1 on including DESCRIBE queries as examples of SPARQL fragments. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > Hi John, > > > In section 4.3 SPARQL query results [1] it talks about CONSTRUCT, but > shouldn't also DESCRIBE be mentioned here too? > > Thanks for mentioning this! > > I would personally say that DESCRIBE queries are implementation-specific > CONSTRUCT queries, > and they are quite hard to capture because of this. > Furthermore, the section is non-normative, so it serves more as an example > here. > > However, I'm open to include DESCRIBE here if it's an added value, > i.e., adds more than it confuses people :-) > > So I'll bounce the question back to you and to the community: > what do you think, is adding DESCRIBE an added value? > > Best, > > Ruben >
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 07:30:13 UTC