Re: `void :triples` redefined to be an estimate (#89)

>> I got a verbal confirmation of Richard Cyganiak, co-author of VoID,
>> that "void:triples was never meant to be an exact number".
>> But of course, if that's not what the spec says, we should be careful.
> 
> Is there something we can point to? Even if it's just a post on some mailing
> list?

I'll contact the VoID authors for this.

Ruben

Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2015 10:32:38 UTC