- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:14:23 +0100
- To: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
>> OWL does it. I understand most people don't want to go that >> “complex” (even though it's quite alright), but we should just be >> aware that a modeling-based solution also exists. > > And it would have the beauty that it is already available and the > concepts are known, at least by modelers. I would certainly prefer > that over defining new hydra properties. > > What do you have in mind, maybe owl:Restriction? owl:oneOf seems to be the best candidate: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-ref-20021112/#oneOf-def Best, Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2015 12:14:57 UTC