On 01/06/2015 10:25 AM, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
>> Just checking: is everybody aware that according to the official RDF spec, rdfs:Resource includes literal nodes? This may be another difference between hydra:Resource and rdfs:Resource.
>
> Fair enough; but by saying:
> <x> a rdfs:Resource.
> we already know that <x> is not a literal.
You may possibly like to check out example from Data Shapes list, used
in the end of this email by Peter F. Patel-Schneider
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2014Dec/0274.html
<blockqoute>
For example, one can say in RDF
ex:two rdf:type xsd:Integer .
ex:two ex:prime xsd:true .
</blockqoute>