- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 09:58:43 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
> That was quick :-) Thanks. I'll first send out a call for consensus before > merging this though. By all means! > ... and they should also be instance of hydra:Resource, not subclasses > thereof, right? True, those lines incorrectly remained from the previous version. I wonder whether it makes sense to add hydra:Resource explicitly as type, since we now have the more specific type hydra:VariableRepresentation. (And also given the discussion about Resource and Class). Best, Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2015 08:59:16 UTC