- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:23:50 -0500
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54AAAC86.4050106@openlinksw.com>
On 1/5/15 6:58 AM, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > Dear all, > > For reasons of simplicity and vocabulary reuse, > could we remove hydra:Resource and hydra:Class? > > Right now, everything in the Hydra Core Vocabulary > is a hydra:Resource, and all classes are hydra:Class. > > The only difference between hydra:Resource and rdfs:Resource > is that hydra:Resource instances are dereferenceable; > and rdfs:Resource itself adds no semantics whatsoever, since > “all things described by RDF are instances of the class rdfs:Resource” [1]. > > Dereferenceability is orthogonal to ontological relationships, > and should IMHO be a recommended practice in the spec > rather than an ontological relationship. It does not add anything at all: > - If a client wants to dereference, the absence of hydra:Resource > does*not* mean something is*not* dereferenceable. > - If a client wants to dereference a hydra:Resource, > it takes the exact same steps it would for something > that is not explicitly labeled a hydra:Resource. > - The only difference is the “guarantee” offered by the ontology > that something is dereferenceable; but actually doing the dereferencing > and finding out whether something is dereferenceable > involves the exact same step, i.e., GETting the thing. > No gain there. > > In addition, hydra:Class is simply the disjunction > of hydra:Resource and rdfs:Class, > so by the above reasoning, we can simply make it rdfs:Class. > > It seems to me that hydra:Resource and hydra:Class > are artifacts of something that no longer has importance. > I therefore propose to simplify and clarify the ontology by: > - removing hydra:Resource and mentions of it; > - removing hydra:Class and replace mentions of it by rdfs:Class. > If necessary, we can add something to the spec about dereferencing, > but I don't think that this would add something. > > Any thoughts on this? > If we all agree, I can make the necessary edits to the spec. > > Best, > > Ruben > > [1]http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_resource +1 Happy New Year ! -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 15:24:13 UTC