- From: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 19:04:15 +0100
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
Hi François, Am 16.02.2015 um 16:53 schrieb François-Paul Servant: > I wouldn't go as far as dropping hydra:member, as Dietrich suggests. Yep, that was too radical. I found that an explicit hydra:member could be useful if there is no publicly defined property for the collection to manage. See [1] for why a collection without 'manages block' might be useful. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2015Feb/0102.html Best regards, Dietrich
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2015 18:04:56 UTC