- From: Maik Riechert <maik.riechert@arcor.de>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:55:37 +0100
- To: Thomas Hoppe <thomas.hoppe@n-fuse.de>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi Thomas,
> based on the new hydra:PartialCollectionView based pagination
> I have tried to combine this with the limit / offset based pagination
> scheme
> (that I want to keep) and here is the result based on a JSON-LD example:
>
> "@id": "http://example.com/events/",
> "@type": "Collection",
> "totalItems": 12664,
> "member": [
> ...
> ],
> "view": {
> "@id": "http://example.com/events/?limit=250&offset=250",
> "@type": [ "hydra:PartialCollectionView", "ex:PartialCollectionView" ],
> "first": "/events/?limit=250",
> "previous": "/events/?limit=250&offset=0",
> "next": "/events/?limit=250&offset=500",
> "last": "/events/?limit=250&offset=12500",
> "ex:offset": 250,
> "ex:membersPerView:" {
> "@type": "IriTemplate",
> "ex:defaultLimit": "100",
> "template": "/events/{?limit,offset}",
> "mapping": [
> {
> "@type": "IriTemplateMapping",
> "variable": "limit",
> "property": "ex:PartialCollectionView#limit"
> },
> {
> "@type": "IriTemplateMapping",
> "variable": "offset",
> "property": "ex:PartialCollectionView#offset"
> }
> ]
> }
> }
I would put "ex:membersPerView" outside of the "view" since it doesn't
say anything about that specific partial view/page. But I'm not 100%
sure on this one.
Then I would not have "defaultLimit" but just include the actual
"limit", also in the default case. I would put the "limit" also in the
"view" just as your "offset".
I think the syntax "ex:PartialCollectionView#offset" is not really
valid, but that's just a minor thing.
Looking forward to hear other's opinions.
Cheers
Maik
>
> Unprefixed properties are from hydra:.
> Custom stuff is prefixed with ex:.
>
> So obviously I have introduced a new class with the properties
> ex:limit and ex:offset which
> should carry the actual semantics of this pagination scheme.
> ex:defaultLimit is to inform the client which limit is used if no
> limit is supplied by the client.
>
> I had a quick look at other vocabs and could find something matching
> in SPIN:
>
> http://spinrdf.org/sp#limit
> http://spinrdf.org/sp#offset
>
> So I might use them instead.
>
> What do you think about this model?
>
> BG, Thomas
>
>
Received on Monday, 21 December 2015 09:56:04 UTC