- From: Robie, Jonathan <jonathan.robie@emc.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:41:02 +0000
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Precisely. Jonathan ________________________________________ From: Erik Wilde [dret@berkeley.edu] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:09 PM To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya; public-hydra@w3.org Cc: Robie, Jonathan Subject: Re: What is the correct media-type for a Hydra specification? hello. On 2015-04-13 23:30, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: > To answer your question, as far as I know (as a newbie), there is no > specific media type defined for hydra api > documentation. 'application/ld+json' and the content says it is an > ApiDocumentation using rdf:type. But I would be interested to know where > you are coming from? i am guessing it's two worlds colliding. the REST community typically likes specific media types, so that resources explicitly surface the models that they represent. it makes resources self-describing *through their media type*. RDF, on the other hand, typically only exposes its metamodel and uses the media type for serialization variants, assuming that saying "it's RDF" is good enough. this makes resources self-describing *once you process them*. cheers, dret. -- erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 | | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 06:42:18 UTC