RE: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing

On 3 Sep 2014 at 22:34, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
>>> +1. It seems like the spec is forming into fairly discrete
components(?),
>>> and it may be good to have a diagram per component. At first, start with
>>> the basic building blocks, and then give the "big picture" at the end.
>> 
>> Good idea!
> 
> I think this is a good strategy in general.
> We could learn a lot from the JSON-LD spec.

Yeah, we invested quite a bit of time in that spec.


> I just got another mail about the perceived complexity;

Could you please forward that mail to the list (of course only if the sender
is OK with it)?


> it would be great if we could start simple, and continue from there.
> Maybe even a primer would help.

Let's try to write the spec in a way which makes a primer unnecessary.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 21:18:58 UTC