- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:18:57 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
> Right. Nevertheless some applications (e.g. rendering UIs) can be simplified > if the totalItems property is "reasonably accurate". That's why I would like > to avoid defining it strictly and instead slightly tweak the explanation in > the TPF spec to avoid inferences as the one Kjetil made :-) > > Makes sense? Reasonably accurate sounds fine indeed. But… > The metadata set MAY additionally contain variations of the above > Triple [void:triples]. For instance, if the exact number of matching > triples is known, it is RECOMMENDED to add a triple with the > same subject and object and the hydra:totalItems predicate. I'm wondering now whether the Hydra property should be the default and the VoID property recommended. But that of course depends on how "reasonably accurate" hydra:totalItems is defined. As far as it is implemented now, the best possible estimate is used for void:triples, and I don't see any reason to do otherwise. Is that best possible estimate good enough for hydra:totalItems? Any thoughts on this? Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:19:26 UTC