- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:00:40 +0100
- To: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
- Cc: holger@topquadrant.com
Dear all, We were mentioned on the Data Shapes list. Best, Ruben Begin forwarded message: > From: Anastasia Dimou <anastasia.dimou@ugent.be> > Subject: FYI Fwd: Hydra and Shapes > Date: 18 Nov 2014 12:58:30 GMT+1 > To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> > > But surprisingly no one replied last evening. > Bests, > Anastasia > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Hydra and Shapes > Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 04:05:55 +0000 > Resent-From: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:03:09 +1000 > From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> > To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > > > I just added a user story for Hydra > > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S29:_Describing_interoperable.2C_hypermedia-driven_Web_APIs_.28with_Hydra.29 > > > This is a W3C community group with 100+ participants, working on what > appears to be an overlapping problem space to ours. Their vocabulary > includes the notion of "supported properties" which may align with > oslc:property, owl:Restriction etc. Like our own WG, this effort is > still evolving, so I am wondering whether it makes sense to try to > coordinate efforts towards an alignment between vocabularies before > things diverge into parallel universes... > > Holger
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 12:01:18 UTC