- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 12:48:12 -0700
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: "<public-hydra@w3.org>" <public-hydra@w3.org>
On May 14, 2014, at 12:27 PM, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > >> On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:29 PM, Chris Chapman wrote: >> OK, I think the main points of my argument have been scattered across a few emails, so I'm >> going to use the convention Markus set forth last month so we can address this issue in a >> more organized way. > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this Chris. This is really helpful. I don't really have to add much and as I already said, I could live with both terms as they are more or less synonyms for me. > > Thomas seems to prefer Operation, Gregg (please correct me if I'm wrong) also slightly prefers Operation. I actually found Chris' client-centric approach convincing and slightly favor Action now. > Chris strongly advocates Action. Since this in the end boils down to how people interpret these terms and of course also personal preference I would like to hear more opinions about this before we make a decision. So, please raise your voices :-) > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2014 19:48:46 UTC