- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:21:24 +0100
- To: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, <public-hydra@w3.org>, <public-lod@w3.org>, "'W3C Web Schemas Task Force'" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 7:04 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > On 03/24/2014 08:24 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Thanks, > > Markus > > > > > > P.S.: I'm aware of how LDP handles this issue, but, while I generally > > like the approach it takes, I don't like that fact that it imposes a > > specific interaction model. > > > > So LDP handles this issue, and is going through the W3C process. Why > not hold your nose and use it? Or even better, participate and fix it? Because in my opinion the model LDP is based on is doomed to fail. I expressed that concern a couple of times (at conferences where LDP was presented).. if I find the time (which will be tricky as I'm traveling from tomorrow onwards), I may even do a full review of the spec. > PS: It took me quite a while to figure out just that LDP was trying to > do, and how it was proposing to do it. That's probably a sign that > more user-facing documentation is needed. Yeah. LC ends April 2nd.. So perhaps you report your concerns as well :-P -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 18:22:07 UTC