RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships

On Monday, March 24, 2014 4:47 PM, Jason Douglas wrote:
> schema:knows can be multi-valued so it's already a
> "collection" of sorts.  

Well, yeah. However, since schema.org doesn't define any cardinality constraints, basically everything is.


> Would it be correct to summarize your question as, how do we enable
> "mechanical" features like addressability and pagination to a value
> collection in a way that doesn't interfere with its semantics (i.e.,
> change the range)?  

Yup, this sums it up quite well. Thanks.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 16:02:41 UTC