- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:36:19 -0400
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <532C5C73.4020702@openlinksw.com>
On 3/21/14 10:52 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > This is a case where we should look at LDP [1], as Paul suggested some time > ago. LDP allow you to describe a "DirectContainer" (I find the naming quite > confusing) as follows: > > </GreggKellogg> a foaf:Person ; > foaf:knows </MarkusLanthaler> . > > </GreggKellogg/friends> a ldp:DirectContainer; > dcterms:title "Gregg's friends"; > ldp:membershipResource </GreggKellogg>; > ldp:hasMemberRelation foaf:knows; > ldp:contains </MarkusLanthaler> . Tweaking the Turtle for Linked Data clarity since you refer to LDP. Entity naming (denotations) has to be unambiguous. </GreggKellogg#this> a foaf:Person ; foaf:knows </MarkusLanthaler#this> . ## The rest is unchanged assuming the remaining relations involve entities of type: Document as relation subjects and objects## </GreggKellogg/friends> a ldp:DirectContainer; dcterms:title "Gregg's friends"; ldp:membershipResource </GreggKellogg>; ldp:hasMemberRelation foaf:knows; ldp:contains </MarkusLanthaler> . ## In addition ## </MarkusLanthaler> foaf:topic </MarkusLanthaler#this> . </GreggKellogg> foaf:topic </GreggKellogg#this> . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 21 March 2014 15:37:03 UTC