RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) from Markus Lanthaler on 2014-03-03 (public-hydra@w3.org from March 2014)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:02:54 +0100
To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <021501cf36f1$a8d3ba20$fa7b2e60$@lanthaler@gmx.net>

On Monday, March 03, 2014 3:46 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
> 
> > You are of course right, but that will lead us to a very theoretical
> > discussion. REST by itself, being an architectural style, is a very
> > abstract thing already. So we should mostly discuss things in terms
> > of HTTP here. Furthermore, IMHO, every solution should have a clear
> > problem it is addressing.
> 
> Wow. I'm done here. Good luck.

I'm sad to hear that. I hope you didn't take this as an attack or something.
It certainly wasn't meant that way. 


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 15:03:30 UTC