- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:03:07 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 13 Jun 2014 at 01:24, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > In any case, the collection mechanism is more than just a way of referencing specific > members, but also associating a relationship between a subject and object, which is no-where > to be seen in any ListItem proposal. I am concerned that those of us using both schema.org > and Hydra will have some difficult decisions on how to separate an entity's definition > between multiple resources other than relying exclusively on reverse relationships, and that > still doesn't handle wide many-to-many relationships such as Friend or Follows. Could you please elaborate a bit? Are you worried that simple crawlers and other clients won't be able to reconstruct the complete resource description and it's relationships to other resources? Does the hasCollection/collection forward link help in that regard in your opinion? What do you think makes many-to-many relationships special? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 14:05:30 UTC