- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:53:21 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Ho Tomasz, On Friday, June 06, 2014 8:20 AM, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote: > I'm lookins at the examples on the specification page and many of them > reference the Hydra context http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/context.jsonld. > I was very much surprised to find out that in fact it's a owl > ontology. Yeah, that's a "trick" to reduce the number of HTTP round-trips if you also need to access information about the vocabulary itself. In fact, the context URL redirects to the vocabulary, so perhaps the examples should be updated to use http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra directly. > Do I understand correctly that JSON-LD processor understands it simply > becuase the ontology itself contains a @context, and the rest of it is > actually ignored? Exactly. Remote JSON-LD contexts are nothing else than a JSON-LD document with an @context. A processor will ignore the rest of the document. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 15:53:51 UTC