Re: plural properties should become singular

On 1/30/14 6:28 AM, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
>> The initial idea was to give users a hint about the expected cardinality but I
>> can see how this probably causes more confusion than it helps.
> Note that we could give a hint about cardinality
> if we added some OWL properties to describe that.
>
> The question is: do we want that?
>
> Best,
>
> Ruben
>
>
>
Why not?

OWL isn't a bad thing, so please use it where appropriate i.e., in 
situations where indicating the cardinality of a property actually adds 
value :-)

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen