- From: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 19:04:59 +0100
- To: "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
playing with the proposal for #37.
The open questions mentioned in the issue are:
> 1. Is "supportedProperty" still needed in this case? 2. Should
> "property" and "propertyPath" be combined? 3. Should this
> information still be bound to a class or should we
introduce a wrapper similar to the current SupportedProperty?
I tried to apply the proposal to the reviewRating case. To see just
how terse we can be, I boldly dropped supportedProperty (1) and
combined property and propertyPath (2) Furthermore, I thought if
hydra:constraint :range :PropertyConstraint, I could leave out
PropertyConstraint, too :)
{
"@context":
{
"@vocab": "http://schema.org/",
"hydra": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core#"
},
"@type": "Product",
"name": "Kenmore White 17\" Microwave",
"review":
{
"@id": "http://example.com/products/2/reviews",
"hydra:operation": [
{
"@type": "ReviewAction",
"hydra:method": "POST",
"hydra:expects":
{
"hydra:constraint": [
{
"hydra:propertyPath": "rdf:type",
"hydra:allowedValue": { "@id": "schema:type" },
"required": true
},
{
"hydra:propertyPath": "reviewBody",
"required": true
},
{
"hydra:propertyPath":
["reviewRating", "ratingValue"],
"required": true
}]
}
}]
}
}
My understanding is that the hydra:constraint is really only needed if
there is something to constrain.
Questions:
- - I do not quite understand the purpose of the constraint where the
:allowedValue is a schema:type, for http://schema.org/type turns up
nothing. The constraint seems to mean that the POST must contain an
rdf:type JSON attribute. What should the client add to the request in
order to satisfy the first constraint?
- - What is the meaning of :allowedValue? Why is there no allowedValue
on reviewBody and ratingValue? Could I use it to express e.g. a number
of allowed literals in a request attribute, something like
select-options in HTML?
- - What if a nested property is only required if its parent is present?
In this case: how would we express that the reviewRating is optional?
- - ad 3.) please explain. Which "wrapper similar to the current
SupportedProperty" do you have in mind?
Best regards,
Dietrich
- --
Dietrich Schulten
Escalon System-Entwicklung
Bubenhalde 10
74199 Untergruppenbach
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAlSMf8sACgkQuKLNitGfiZOrCQCfZzfNGNLPqkg8yXqDen+Oj/dd
fNUAoJ6SBHOMw7i5oCgMgitW0B5oK5+n
=qPmr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2014 18:05:31 UTC