- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 15:25:48 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On Friday, April 25, 2014 6:38 PM, Thomas Hoppe wrote: > Just my very compressed 50 Cent on this topic: > - I can follow Ruben's rationale to distinguish a Page and a Paged > Collection although I don't see how this would be relevant in > practice... I think about this from a perspective where you want a > collection be the Range of a property: We would not gain anything from > being able to specify a Page as range... this is an academic case I > think. Using a Paged Collection as range however, a consumer has a > useful concept at hand which, yes, is a hybrid. I think you'd "never" set the range of a property such as "knows" to Page, but would always set it to Collection. > - I don't like the enumeration of Members as Greg proposed it. This is > so LDP, rdf:List but not common in APIs. I agree. That's my main concern. See the other thread. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2014 13:26:37 UTC