- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:40:05 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:33 AM, Thomas Hoppe wrote: > I didn't meant to say that there is no alternative, of course there are -- > You could just introduce your own operation just to name one. > Seeing hydra as a vocabulary to describe APIs it is just annoying to > have 3 of four basic REST operations and one is missing. > However, If we are about to remove them completely (what I also voted > for earlier), this issue is resolved anyway. Exactly... and by the way there exists also http://schema.org/ReadAction which you can use if you need it. > The authorization concern is not only for read requests. > I will share my solution for this to the list once it is somewhat > presentable anyway. I'm looking forward to that, thanks. Authorization is indeed an important aspect in every Web API. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 15:40:32 UTC