W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > November 2013

RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:55:48 +0100
To: <public-hydra@w3.org>, "'W3C Web Schemas Task Force'" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Cc: "'Thad Guidry'" <thadguidry@gmail.com>, "'Sam Goto'" <goto@google.com>, "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@google.com>
Message-ID: <008e01cee0a1$f82d2df0$e88789d0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:46 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 13 November 2013 18:27, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > Yes, but that's still the same API, i.e., Netflix'. What's not clear to me
> > at the moment is whether you interested in cross-service relationships like
> > finding a movie on Hulu and playing it on Netflix. The latest draft you
> > published a couple of days suggests you aren't. So why would the approach is
> > proposed not work in this case?
> 
> I'd suggest that would be a product design / business decision amongst
> implementors. If you have a standard way to know that item123151 on
> Hulu and item6234623 on Netflix are both versions of the film known to
> Wikipedia as http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q108745 then you have most
> of the raw materials for this. Whether some product/application builds
> such service-hopping features is quite another matter.

Fully agreed. That's why I have such a hard time understand Sam's "action -> entities problem".


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 18:56:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:40 UTC