- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 06:59:28 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
It could but, as always, it depends. Does this preference support only one level transclusion? And again, there is the case of inferred types etc, like `"@id": [ "Child", "Parent" ]`. Here the `Parent` would be implicitly added because `<Child> rdfs:subClassOf <Parent>` and thus an update request should not send it back On top of all issues, this information would be provided transparently by the database so the application cannot even tell one from the other -- GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/234#issuecomment-820169687 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2021 06:59:30 UTC