- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:18:28 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
tpluscode has just created a new issue for https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications: == Explicitly assert rdfs:Resource sub class? == ## Describe the requirement The RDF Schema states that everything is an instance of `rdfs:Resource` in section 2.1 > All things described by RDF are called resources, and are instances of the class rdfs:Resource. This is the class of everything. All other classes are subclasses of this class. rdfs:Resource is an instance of rdfs:Class. However, I found that allegrograph's inferencing does not recognise this factor instances of classes which are explicitly `rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource` ## Proposed solutions I was thinking whether we could add `hydra:Resource rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource` to allow more accurate inferencing. On the other hand, we would then have to add a whole lot more explicit and redundant statements like that and similar for `rdf:Property` which should not be necessary Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/232 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2021 19:18:30 UTC