- From: Karol Szczepański via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
Actually, I meant `hydra:operation`. Description of the `hydra:supportedOperation` says _An operation supported by instances of the specific Hydra class or the target of the Hydra link_ - in this case, a link does not meet any of these requirements (it's neither a class nor a target of the link). On the other size, `hydra:operation` has a range of `hydra:Resource`, thus it would be ok to have it attached to the link itself. Logic seems consistent - the link has an operation which changes the way it should be invoked, but the relation remains. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alien-mcl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/149#issuecomment-818933908 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2021 17:57:52 UTC