Re: [Specifications] How to document forbidden dereferencability (#216)

> I'm actually not afraid of SHACL - it's still an RDF.

It doesn't matter if it's RDF.

The client needs to understand the profile to understand whatever semantics a given `expects` or anything else in order to create the request message. If it doesn't, then there is now way to fall back.

> It should still work, though. Agreed?

See above. Yes, some pf the API will work up to a point where the client cannot perform a request described in ways it does no understand 🤷. Surely, it does not mean that the entire API is unusable but YMMV

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/216#issuecomment-635564389 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 28 May 2020 19:59:29 UTC