Re: [Specifications] Native SHACL support (#214)

> I don't see how those two are related to each other. I was thinking on how client could ask server to describe it's data structures with desired vocabulary. 

Quite interesting, but not what I had in mind indeed. I am only considering the API Documentation and not the resources themselves.

What I meant is that a client if we have 

```
hydra:expects schema:rangeIncludes hydra:Class, sh:Shape
```

then a compliant client will have to understand both ways in which an API might describe its operations. And anything else we add to this `schema:rangeIncludes` would have to be supported out of the box.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/214#issuecomment-633548286 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 25 May 2020 12:28:35 UTC