Re: [Specifications] Relative Template URIs (#208)

>You have no reason to ever add it as a triple.

I disagree. This mere URL is something you can work with depending on the protocol and methods in force (for HTTP you can GET it, PUT it, whatever the operation/link says). It is/will be part of the graph. Without IRI templates you would need to provide all those reasources somehow. With IRI template you can learn a client on how to do it all by itself. IRI template is a simple tool here and you're still dealing with RDF graph.

>I have no clue what "procedures" you refer to :)

Then this whole conversation is useless. I meant all those RFC's mentioned.

>Yes, and I propose two base Uris to choose from: link context or one provided by the API

I'm somehow against the one provided by the API - we should stick to RFCs and document URLs'

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by alien-mcl
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/208#issuecomment-619627510 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 26 April 2020 21:26:36 UTC