Re: [Specifications] Vocabulary extensions (#182)

Without going into detailed discussions here I think this PR should be split into 3 PRs, which address the three linked issues it aims to resolve. The other two bullets should (non-RDF payloads and headers) should be first discussed as issues.

Splitting into smaller chunks will allow for focused discussions and prevent one change block an unrelated one from being merged.

On a technical note, it's best to avoid submitting PR from downstream `master` branch because such can cause conflicts once it's merged.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/182#issuecomment-462118838 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 10 February 2019 09:58:17 UTC