- From: Markus Lanthaler via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:15:04 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
> Since property names should describe meaning of the relation we could even consider names like *handledWith* (instead of *request*) I quite like *handledWith*. I'm not a native speaker but *handledBy* sounds slightly better to me. Perhaps *executedBy* / *executableBy* or something similar would be even more intuitive. > and *affords* (instead of *action*). I know that the term affordance is en vogue in API circles but I have yet to find a person outside this small community to understand it :-) > Also if we separate actions from handlers (operations). Resources would most likely reference actions directly via action / affords and possibly not reference handlers directly via operation That would require developers to spell out the same URL twice, right? I guess having a few examples (perhaps in a separate markdown file for now) would help to move this discussion forward. Could you please amend the PR with what you had in mind? Thanks --- Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions. --- *Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/154#-:-L4WymfdiRhqqFvcC9hr:b-l1ftig)* <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notification of comment by lanthaler Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/154#issuecomment-362927118 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2018 18:15:07 UTC