- From: elf Pavlik via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:57:39 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
If we decide to go with PATCH this practically means opening a broader conversation related to use of this HTTP method and making topic of this issue a first relevant use case. BTW https://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#h-ldpr-http_patch > Per [RFC5789], this HTTP method is optional and this specification does not require LDP servers to support it. When a LDP server supports this method, this specification imposes the following new requirements for LDPRs. > Any server-imposed constraints on LDPR creation or update must be advertised to clients. > 4.2.7.1 LDP servers that support PATCH MUST include an Accept-Patch HTTP response header [RFC5789] on HTTP OPTIONS requests, listing patch document media type(s) supported by the server. -- GitHub Notification of comment by elf-pavlik Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/134#issuecomment-330354025 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 18 September 2017 20:57:32 UTC