Tuesday, 31 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] POST/PUT requests in use cases shouldn't use relative URLs to reference the context
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Introduce something like hydra:memberTemplate
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- [Specifications] POST/PUT requests in use cases shouldn't use relative URLs to reference the context
Monday, 30 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
Sunday, 29 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Recommend to use cache revalidation
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
Saturday, 28 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Recommend to use cache revalidation
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)
Wednesday, 25 October 2017
- [Specifications] collections with manages block & Triple Pattern Fragments
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources
Saturday, 21 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
Friday, 20 October 2017
Monday, 16 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- [Specifications] new commits pushed by lanthaler
- [Specifications] new commits pushed by lanthaler
- [Specifications] Merged Pull Request: Explicitly mention namespace in Core Vocabulary document
- Re: [Specifications] Explicitly mention namespace in Core Vocabulary document
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
Sunday, 15 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Explicitly mention namespace in Core Vocabulary document
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
Saturday, 14 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Recommend to use cache revalidation
Friday, 13 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Should we introduce a property to associate operations and their target directly to an entity?
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
Thursday, 12 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
Sunday, 8 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
Thursday, 5 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
Wednesday, 4 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources
- Closed: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
Tuesday, 3 October 2017
Monday, 2 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources
- Re: [Specifications] Should spec mandate on server removing membership triple for deleted resources
Sunday, 1 October 2017
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- [Specifications] CreateAction with HTTP PUT
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members
- Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members