- From: Kévin Dunglas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:41:18 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
In my opinion, it would be a big win if Hydra could describe the most common API use cases without requiring other vocabularies. Using VoID, OWL, and even RDFs increase the perceived complexity for newcomers and is bad for the adoption of the vocabulary. If implementing or consuming a Hydra API require a lot of knowledge regarding Linked Data / Semantic Web technologies, it will discourage a lot of people. On the other hand both Swagger and GraphQL are self-contained formats, you just to read (and understand) one spec to be ready to create or consume an API using them. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dunglas Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/126#issuecomment-311448165 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2017 18:41:25 UTC