- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 08:58:51 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
That's quite interesting. I like how you use schema:potentialAction. The only big difference now is the use of `schema:target`, which turns the action around compared to current operation spec (the target being the subject of `hydra:operation`). And of course supported operations (supported actions?) in `ApiDocumentation` would need to be refactored too. I see now clearly how an action has a domain meaning and the operation is used to describe the technicalities. Which makes me think that maybe we could simplify the operation terms indeed. If the value of `???:operation` was actually a description of the HTTP request could reuse some of the [HTTP vocab](http://www.w3.org/2011/http#). Not only would Hydra get decoupled from HTTP but we'd also open a whole new possibility of operations other that HTTP (could be a good thing?). -- GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/2#issuecomment-269856359 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2016 08:58:57 UTC