Tuesday, 30 September 2014
Monday, 29 September 2014
Sunday, 28 September 2014
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
Saturday, 27 September 2014
- [CSSWG][css-display] Updated WD of CSS Display L3
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
Friday, 26 September 2014
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
Thursday, 25 September 2014
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: After 5 - radical idea: test first development
- Re: After 5 - radical idea: no editors
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
- proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy
Monday, 22 September 2014
Sunday, 21 September 2014
Thursday, 18 September 2014
Wednesday, 17 September 2014
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- RE: After 5
- RE: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
Tuesday, 16 September 2014
- RE: After 5
- Re: After 5
- RE: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- Re: After 5
- After 5
- RE: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Extensible Web Summit Berlin
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
Tuesday, 9 September 2014
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Re: HTML - No Copy Option
- Re: HTML - No Copy Option
- HTML - No Copy Option
Friday, 5 September 2014
Tuesday, 2 September 2014
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- RE: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec
- Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec