public-html@w3.org from November 2014 by date

Friday, 28 November 2014

• HTML JSON form submission Christophe Grand

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

• Re: SVG 1.1 default implicit ARIA semantics Steve Faulkner
• Re: SVG 1.1 default implicit ARIA semantics Alexander Surkov
• Re: [5.1] the menu element and its usage as application menubar Alexander Surkov

Saturday, 22 November 2014

• RE: IE and support for exposing semantics of non-interactive HTML semantics Cynthia Shelly

Friday, 21 November 2014

• IE and support for exposing semantics of non-interactive HTML semantics Steve Faulkner

Thursday, 20 November 2014

• Re: [5.1] the menu element and its usage as application menubar Daniel Glazman
• Re: [5.1] the menu element and its usage as application menubar Pradeep Kumar
• Re: [5.1] the menu element and its usage as application menubar Daniel Glazman

Wednesday, 19 November 2014

• Re: [5.1] the menu element and its usage as application menubar Pradeep Kumar
• [5.1] the menu element and its usage as application menubar Daniel Glazman

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

• Re: SVG 1.1 default implicit ARIA semantics Steve Faulkner
• Re: SVG 1.1 default implicit ARIA semantics Doug Schepers

Thursday, 13 November 2014

• Re: <iframe@sandbox> does more than expected. Boris Zbarsky
• <iframe@sandbox> does more than expected. Andrea Rendine

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

• Re: <details> element clarifications Andrea Rendine
• exposing <time> element semantics Steve Faulkner

Sunday, 9 November 2014

• <details> element clarifications Maksim Chemerisuk

Monday, 10 November 2014

• Re: Next Tasks on the Text Alternatives Document Steve Faulkner
• Re: The details element Steve Faulkner
• The details element Andrea Rendine

Tuesday, 4 November 2014

• Re: A missing point in the HTML5 spec Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: A missing point in the HTML5 spec Robin Berjon
• Re: A missing point in the HTML5 spec Shane McCarron
• Re: A missing point in the HTML5 spec Robin Berjon
• RE: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Léonie Watson
• Re: A missing point in the HTML5 spec Shane McCarron
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair sam
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Lukáš Čihák
• Re: A missing point in the HTML5 spec Steve Faulkner
• RE: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: A missing point in the HTML5 spec Andry Rendy
• A missing point in the HTML5 spec Andry Rendy
• Re: Proposal to change documentation on tabindex to strongly discourage values greater 0 Steve Faulkner
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Jukka K. Korpela

Monday, 3 November 2014

• close html org public services. nure alam

Tuesday, 4 November 2014

• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair sam

Monday, 3 November 2014

• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner
• RE: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Sean
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Jens O. Meiert
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Steve Faulkner

Sunday, 2 November 2014

• Re: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair Pradeep Kumar

Saturday, 1 November 2014

• suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair sam

Sunday, 2 November 2014

• Re: HTML has no definition / automated test suite Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: HTML has no definition / automated test suite Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: HTML has no definition / automated test suite Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: HTML has no definition / automated test suite Stefan Reich
• Re: HTML has no definition / automated test suite Jukka K. Korpela

Saturday, 1 November 2014

• Re: HTML has no definition / automated test suite Patrick H. Lauke
• HTML has no definition / automated test suite Stefan Reich

Last message date: Friday, 28 November 2014 10:50:36 UTC