Saturday, 31 March 2012
Friday, 30 March 2012
- [Bug 16586] New: Accessibility API Role Mapping Matrix missing math and svg elements
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-197 accept-file-ext by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-196 ua-http-resp-handling by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-193 inaccessible-example by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-80 title-alternative by Amicable Resolution
- ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution
- Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2
- Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1
- Re: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- [Bug 16578] New: Characters appended to temporary buffer are not specified to be lower-cased. But comparisons against this buffer seem to be expecting this. Example: "8.2.4.28 Script data double escape start state" -> "U+003E GREATER-THAN SIGN (>)" "If the temporary buff
Thursday, 29 March 2012
- [Bug 16575] New: cors settings attribute - unclear meaning of 'omitted'
- [Bug 16574] New: editorial - add note that UA need not send Origin header
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- comments from SVG WG forthcoming on recent canvas/path additions
- [Bug 16572] New: Meta generator: Validator must say that alt conformance check was skipped
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- RE: Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
- [Bug 16564] New: The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- Chair pre-review of the issue-204 change proposals
- RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- [Bug 16553] New: Consider not firing a needkey event when a potentially encrypted stream is encountered if the key is already known
- [Bug 16552] New: Consider making needkey a simple event
- [Bug 16551] New: Is there any reason for defaultUrl to be non-null in any but the first keymessage event?
- [Bug 16550] New: Should sessionId checks in addKey() and cancelKeyRequest() be synchronous?
- [Bug 16549] New: Remove initData parameter from addKey()
- [Bug 16548] New: Require generateKeyRequest() in all cases for all Key Systems
- [Bug 16547] New: Is there a use case for explicitly releasing keys?
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
- Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
- Re: Chair review of the issue-185 change proposals
- [Bug 16544] New: Clarify frame handling for frame based encryption
- [Bug 16543] New: Clarify that the spec adds explicit support for content protection
- [Bug 16542] New: Clarify abstract about "No 'DRM' is added"
- [Bug 16541] New: Update examples to use async XHR
- RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- [Bug 16540] New: Provide guidelines on Key System string format
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
- [Bug 16538] New: aria mapping for details and summary are problematic
- RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
- Chair review of the issue-185 change proposals
- Chair review of the issue-184 change proposals
- ARIA roles for hit regions
- hit testing proposal added to Hixie's HTML
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-190 coding-example by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
Monday, 26 March 2012
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
Monday, 26 March 2012
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
- RE: Revert request r7023
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- [Bug 16524] New: Hi Ian, I've some comments about the recent added line dashes. Right now, the mozilla and webkit implements this as an attribute, but in this version, it uses setLineDash() and getLineDash(). These setter/getter are not consistent with the other line styl
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Re: Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- [Bug 16520] New: Don't indicate that XML MIME types *requires* xml:lang
Sunday, 25 March 2012
- [Bug 16515] New: Fix the wording on the @value attribute
- [Bug 16514] New: Replace "The" with "An" (improved wording)
Saturday, 24 March 2012
Sunday, 25 March 2012
Saturday, 24 March 2012
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Are @posters background images? [Was: Text description for @poster]
- RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
- [Bug 16504] New: Improve white-space note. E.g. add that not just JS but CSS too is affected
- [Bug 16503] New: [AAPI]:
Friday, 23 March 2012
Saturday, 24 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
Friday, 23 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
Thursday, 22 March 2012
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
- [Bug 16472] New: Consider DOMString? for HTMLInputElement:value IDL attribute
- [Bug 16466] New: for ellipse: "radius radians" should be "rotation radians"
Friday, 23 March 2012
Thursday, 22 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- CfC: Close ISSUE-197 accept-file-ext by Amicable Resolution
- CfC: Close ISSUE-196 ua-http-resp-handling by Amicable Resolution
- CfC: Close ISSUE-193 inaccessible-example by Amicable Resolution
- RE: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Heading towards a feature freeze (was: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22)
- Re: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22
- {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: Verbosity of microdata
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: Verbosity of microdata
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Verbosity of microdata
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Verbosity of microdata
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
- Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
- RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- CfC: Close ISSUE-80 title-alternative by Amicable Resolution
- ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-192 title-attribute by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-188: generic-track-format by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-187 validity-stability by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-182 footnote-recommendation by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
- Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: Change proposal for Issue 203
- Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution
- Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1
- Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2
- Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- Re: Revert request r7023
- AW: Element Failure Mode
- Element Failure Mode
- CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
- [Bug 16442] New: This page nearly crashes my browser (firefox 10.0.2) as it attempts to load the whole long length of the page. This seems to be a major disadvantage, making it hard to read the spec when just loading it has the potential to crash or extremely slow the br
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
Monday, 19 March 2012
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Call for Review: Web Audio API
Sunday, 18 March 2012
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Sorry for meaningles subject. Was: <off-public.html>: etc
- <off-public.html>: hypothetical question on longdesc
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
- RE: hypothetical question on longdesc
Saturday, 17 March 2012
Friday, 16 March 2012
- Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal (was {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics)
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: FW: Revert request r7023
- [Bug 16401] New: potential typo in browsing context note
- [Bug 16400] New: 'radio button group' rule issue
- [Bug 16399] New: 'reset the form owner' algorithm issue
Thursday, 15 March 2012
- [Bug 16394] New: Form-associated elements with non-ancestor form owners should be reset when owner is removed from the tree
- [Bug 16393] New: The last paragraph of "Caret and selection management" use a phrase to define itself: "The caret position is the rectangular left edge of the caret position within an element having focus." So a caret position is the left edge of a caret position is the l
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Friday, 16 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics
- Spec behavior for img.src sets is not quite web-compatible
- Re: Enabling DRM Task Force Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Enabling DRM Task Force Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
Thursday, 15 March 2012
- RE: Revert request r7023
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: Option element in a Datalist with no label
- ay face-to-face registration (RE: CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG)
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: Revert request
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics
- RE: CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Option element in a Datalist with no label
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Verbosity of microdata
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Verbosity of microdata
- Re: Verbosity of microdata
- Verbosity of microdata
- Fwd: Re: Working Group Last Call: httpbis p4 / p5 / p6 / p7
- Re: Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Option element in a Datalist with no label
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- RE: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
- Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Chair Feedback on Change Proposal for ISSUE-183
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- RE: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: Revert request
- RE: Revert request r7023
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- RE: Revert request
- RE: Revert request
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Revert request r7023
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Revert request r7023
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- RE: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: Revert request
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
- RE: Review of second reopen request for issue 31b [alt-location]
- RE: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- RE: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Revert request
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
Monday, 12 March 2012
Sunday, 11 March 2012
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Monday, 12 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: implementation of HTML5 context menu
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: implementation of HTML5 context menu
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
Friday, 9 March 2012
Saturday, 10 March 2012
Monday, 12 March 2012
- implementation of details/summary appears suboptimal
- implementation of HTML5 context menu
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
Sunday, 11 March 2012
- Re: video.getContext
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- New Heartbeat WD for HTML+RDFa 1.1
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
Saturday, 10 March 2012
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Introductiones
- Re: Introductiones
- Re: Introductiones
Friday, 9 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- RE: CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
- RE: video.getContext
- Re: video.getContext
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: video.getContext
- RE: video.getContext
- Re: video.getContext
- video.getContext
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
Thursday, 8 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- [Bug 16269] New: I think there needs to be a way to, when a document has multiple style elements which have different titles, specify which of the stylesheets are alternate stylesheets and which one is the default stylesheet.
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: Revert request
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: Chair Review of the Change Proposals for issue 179
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
- Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: ISSUE-164: remove or modify hgroup
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- <style scoped> and the cascade
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-183 sub-issue: time syntax
- CfC: Close ISSUE-187 validity-stability by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
- RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Revert request
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Jeff Jaffe on W3C and DRM
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- [Bug 16239] New: Add a section on Obsolete APIs
- [Bug 16237] New: Rename Absent to Obsolete
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Revert request
- Revert request
- 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Fwd: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-03.txt
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Monday, 5 March 2012
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Monday, 5 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Signaling and out of band content, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: CDM availability (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- [Bug 16231] New: Why do I have to end the script tag when loading a script from an external resource? I have to do: <script src="foo.js"></script> I think it should be enough to do: <script src="foo.js" />
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Encrypted Media Task Force Re: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-01: issue progress and heartbeat drafts
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- CDM availability (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
Sunday, 4 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Signaling and out of band content, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- RE: May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
Saturday, 3 March 2012
- [Bug 16222] New: editorial: "surrounds ... by''
- [Bug 16221] New: editorial: "as such" doesn't fit
- [Bug 16212] New: I would say that it would also be really nice to implement Google ads or a plugin that converts your .mp4 video to whichever the current browser Supports.
Friday, 2 March 2012
Sunday, 4 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
- Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
Saturday, 3 March 2012
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Friday, 2 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Change proposal for Issue 203
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: reference in HTML5 differences document.
Thursday, 1 March 2012
- Re: reference in HTML5 differences document.
- [Bug 16190] New: Polyglot Markup: Clarify that xml:lang is optional
- Change Proposal for ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- [Bug 16186] New: HTML 5 missing explicit directives for support full keyboard access (FKA) when navigating to a fragment identifier
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
- [Bug 16169] New: Define the CSSElementMap
- [Bug 16167] New: i18n-ISSUE-141: Mistake in entity assignments
- [Bug 16166] New: i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5
- [Bug 16165] New: i18n-ISSUE-136: Recognition of number formats in Number state
- [Bug 16164] New: Section 11 is blank
- [Bug 16160] New: dir=auto does not work for user-visible attribute values