Saturday, 31 March 2012
Friday, 30 March 2012
- [Bug 16586] New: Accessibility API Role Mapping Matrix missing math and svg elements
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-197 accept-file-ext by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-196 ua-http-resp-handling by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-193 inaccessible-example by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-80 title-alternative by Amicable Resolution
 - ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Straw Poll for Objections
 - Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution
 - Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2
 - Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1
 - Re: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - [Bug 16578] New: Characters appended to temporary buffer are not specified to be lower-cased. But comparisons against this buffer seem to be expecting this. Example: "8.2.4.28 Script data double escape start state" -> "U+003E GREATER-THAN SIGN (>)" "If the temporary buff
 
Thursday, 29 March 2012
- [Bug 16575] New: cors settings attribute - unclear meaning of 'omitted'
 - [Bug 16574] New: editorial - add note that UA need not send Origin header
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
 - comments from SVG WG forthcoming on recent canvas/path additions
 - [Bug 16572] New: Meta generator: Validator must say that alt conformance check was skipped
 - Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - RE: Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal
 
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
- [Bug 16564] New: The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
 - Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - Chair pre-review of the issue-204 change proposals
 - RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - [Bug 16553] New: Consider not firing a needkey event when a potentially encrypted stream is encountered if the key is already known
 - [Bug 16552] New: Consider making needkey a simple event
 - [Bug 16551] New: Is there any reason for defaultUrl to be non-null in any but the first keymessage event?
 - [Bug 16550] New: Should sessionId checks in addKey() and cancelKeyRequest() be synchronous?
 - [Bug 16549] New: Remove initData parameter from addKey()
 - [Bug 16548] New: Require generateKeyRequest() in all cases for all Key Systems
 - [Bug 16547] New: Is there a use case for explicitly releasing keys?
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
 - Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
 - Re: Chair review of the issue-185 change proposals
 - [Bug 16544] New: Clarify frame handling for frame based encryption
 - [Bug 16543] New: Clarify that the spec adds explicit support for content protection
 - [Bug 16542] New: Clarify abstract about "No 'DRM' is added"
 - [Bug 16541] New: Update examples to use async XHR
 - RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
 - [Bug 16540] New: Provide guidelines on Key System string format
 - Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
 - [Bug 16538] New: aria mapping for details and summary are problematic
 - RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals
 - Chair review of the issue-185 change proposals
 - Chair review of the issue-184 change proposals
 - ARIA roles for hit regions
 - hit testing proposal added to Hixie's HTML
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-190 coding-example by Amicable Resolution
 - Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 
Monday, 26 March 2012
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 
Monday, 26 March 2012
- Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll
 - RE: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - [Bug 16524] New: Hi Ian, I've some comments about the recent added line dashes. Right now, the mozilla and webkit implements this as an attribute, but in this version, it uses setLineDash() and getLineDash(). These setter/getter are not consistent with the other line styl
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Re: Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - [Bug 16520] New: Don't indicate that XML MIME types *requires* xml:lang
 
Sunday, 25 March 2012
- [Bug 16515] New: Fix the wording on the @value attribute
 - [Bug 16514] New: Replace "The" with "An" (improved wording)
 
Saturday, 24 March 2012
Sunday, 25 March 2012
Saturday, 24 March 2012
- Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Are @posters background images? [Was: Text description for @poster]
 - RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc])
 - [Bug 16504] New: Improve white-space note. E.g. add that not just JS but CSS too is affected
 - [Bug 16503] New: [AAPI]:
 
Friday, 23 March 2012
Saturday, 24 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 
Friday, 23 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 
Thursday, 22 March 2012
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
- [Bug 16472] New: Consider DOMString? for HTMLInputElement:value IDL attribute
 - [Bug 16466] New: for ellipse: "radius radians" should be "rotation radians"
 
Friday, 23 March 2012
Thursday, 22 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - CfC: Close ISSUE-197 accept-file-ext by Amicable Resolution
 - CfC: Close ISSUE-196 ua-http-resp-handling by Amicable Resolution
 - CfC: Close ISSUE-193 inaccessible-example by Amicable Resolution
 - RE: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Heading towards a feature freeze (was: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22)
 - Re: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22
 - {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: Verbosity of microdata
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: Verbosity of microdata
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Verbosity of microdata
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Verbosity of microdata
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
 - Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
- RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - CfC: Close ISSUE-80 title-alternative by Amicable Resolution
 - ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
- Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-192 title-attribute by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-188: generic-track-format by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-187 validity-stability by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-182 footnote-recommendation by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
 - Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid by Amicable Resolution
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: Change proposal for Issue 203
 - Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution
 - Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1
 - Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2
 - Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - AW: Element Failure Mode
 - Element Failure Mode
 - CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]
 - [Bug 16442] New: This page nearly crashes my browser (firefox 10.0.2) as it attempts to load the whole long length of the page. This seems to be a major disadvantage, making it hard to read the spec when just loading it has the potential to crash or extremely slow the br
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
 
Monday, 19 March 2012
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Call for Review: Web Audio API
 
Sunday, 18 March 2012
- Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Sorry for meaningles subject. Was: <off-public.html>: etc
 - <off-public.html>: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - Re: hypothetical question on longdesc
 - RE: hypothetical question on longdesc
 
Saturday, 17 March 2012
Friday, 16 March 2012
- Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal (was {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics)
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: FW: Revert request r7023
 - [Bug 16401] New: potential typo in browsing context note
 - [Bug 16400] New: 'radio button group' rule issue
 - [Bug 16399] New: 'reset the form owner' algorithm issue
 
Thursday, 15 March 2012
- [Bug 16394] New: Form-associated elements with non-ancestor form owners should be reset when owner is removed from the tree
 - [Bug 16393] New: The last paragraph of "Caret and selection management" use a phrase to define itself: "The caret position is the rectangular left edge of the caret position within an element having focus." So a caret position is the left edge of a caret position is the l
 
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Friday, 16 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics
 - Spec behavior for img.src sets is not quite web-compatible
 - Re: Enabling DRM Task Force Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Enabling DRM Task Force Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 
Thursday, 15 March 2012
- RE: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: Option element in a Datalist with no label
 - ay face-to-face registration (RE: CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG)
 - Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
 - Re: Revert request
 - RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics
 - RE: CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Option element in a Datalist with no label
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Verbosity of microdata
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Verbosity of microdata
 - Re: Verbosity of microdata
 - Verbosity of microdata
 - Fwd: Re: Working Group Last Call: httpbis p4 / p5 / p6 / p7
 - Re: Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Option element in a Datalist with no label
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - RE: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
- Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Chair Feedback on Change Proposal for ISSUE-183
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - RE: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: Revert request
 - RE: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - RE: Revert request
 - RE: Revert request
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
 - Re: Revert request r7023
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Revert request r7023
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - RE: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
 - RE: Review of second reopen request for issue 31b [alt-location]
 - RE: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - RE: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 
Monday, 12 March 2012
Sunday, 11 March 2012
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Monday, 12 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: implementation of HTML5 context menu
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: implementation of HTML5 context menu
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 
Friday, 9 March 2012
Saturday, 10 March 2012
Monday, 12 March 2012
- implementation of details/summary appears suboptimal
 - implementation of HTML5 context menu
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 
Sunday, 11 March 2012
- Re: video.getContext
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - New Heartbeat WD for HTML+RDFa 1.1
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 
Saturday, 10 March 2012
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
 - Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Introductiones
 - Re: Introductiones
 - Re: Introductiones
 
Friday, 9 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Note in HTML4 spec about html5?
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - RE: CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
 - RE: video.getContext
 - Re: video.getContext
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: video.getContext
 - RE: video.getContext
 - Re: video.getContext
 - video.getContext
 - Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 
Thursday, 8 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports
 - Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - [Bug 16269] New: I think there needs to be a way to, when a document has multiple style elements which have different titles, specify which of the stylesheets are alternate stylesheets and which one is the default stylesheet.
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: Chair Review of the Change Proposals for issue 179
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
- Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports
 - Re: <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far)
 - Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: ISSUE-164: remove or modify hgroup
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - <style scoped> and the cascade
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Working Group Decision on ISSUE-183 sub-issue: time syntax
 - CfC: Close ISSUE-187 validity-stability by Amicable Resolution
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
 
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
- RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
 - CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Revert request
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Jeff Jaffe on W3C and DRM
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - [Bug 16239] New: Add a section on Obsolete APIs
 - [Bug 16237] New: Rename Absent to Obsolete
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Revert request
 - Revert request
 - 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Fwd: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-03.txt
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 
Monday, 5 March 2012
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 
Monday, 5 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Signaling and out of band content, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: CDM availability (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - [Bug 16231] New: Why do I have to end the script tag when loading a script from an external resource? I have to do: <script src="foo.js"></script> I think it should be enough to do: <script src="foo.js" />
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Encrypted Media Task Force Re: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-01: issue progress and heartbeat drafts
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - CDM availability (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 
Sunday, 4 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - RE: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Signaling and out of band content, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - RE: May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
 - Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?!
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 
Saturday, 3 March 2012
- [Bug 16222] New: editorial: "surrounds ... by''
 - [Bug 16221] New: editorial: "as such" doesn't fit
 - [Bug 16212] New: I would say that it would also be really nice to implement Google ads or a plugin that converts your .mp4 video to whichever the current browser Supports.
 
Friday, 2 March 2012
Sunday, 4 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 - Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far
 
Saturday, 3 March 2012
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 
Friday, 2 March 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals]
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Change proposal for Issue 203
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: reference in HTML5 differences document.
 
Thursday, 1 March 2012
- Re: reference in HTML5 differences document.
 - [Bug 16190] New: Polyglot Markup: Clarify that xml:lang is optional
 - Change Proposal for ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - [Bug 16186] New: HTML 5 missing explicit directives for support full keyboard access (FKA) when navigating to a fragment identifier
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
 - May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
 
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
- [Bug 16169] New: Define the CSSElementMap
 - [Bug 16167] New: i18n-ISSUE-141: Mistake in entity assignments
 - [Bug 16166] New: i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5
 - [Bug 16165] New: i18n-ISSUE-136: Recognition of number formats in Number state
 - [Bug 16164] New: Section 11 is blank
 - [Bug 16160] New: dir=auto does not work for user-visible attribute values