Wednesday, 29 February 2012
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: reference in HTML5 differences document.
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: reference in HTML5 differences document.
- reference in HTML5 differences document.
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: ISSUE-187: validity-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs
- Re: FW: Revised Timeline and New Bug Priority Policy
- Re: Chair Review of the Change Proposals for issue 179
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Media Stack: closed source only Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Media Stack: closed source only Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals]
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: ISSUE-187: validity-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element"
- CfC: Close ISSUE-190 coding-example by Amicable Resolution
- CfC: Close ISSUE-192 title-attribute by Amicable Resolution
- CfC: Close ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Monday, 27 February 2012
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
- Re: Missing hardest parts of actual content protection (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Missing hardest parts of actual content protection (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal)
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Monday, 27 February 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Adversaries Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-170, was: ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid: Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Sunday, 26 February 2012
- Re: Request to Reconsider Meta Generator Alt Exception [ISSUE-31]
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Friday, 24 February 2012
Saturday, 25 February 2012
Sunday, 26 February 2012
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Saturday, 25 February 2012
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- RE: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals
Friday, 24 February 2012
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Arbitrary codecs and encryption schemes, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Arbitrary codecs and encryption schemes, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?]
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Arbitrary codecs and encryption schemes, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Thursday, 23 February 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- [Minutes] (HTML WG telecon 2012-02-23: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, task force reports)
- Re: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
Wednesday, 22 February 2012
Thursday, 23 February 2012
- Re: ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Wednesday, 22 February 2012
- RE: ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location
- Chair Review of the Change Proposals for issue 179
- FW: counter proposal for issue 185
- Re: <param> (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- <param> (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Review of second reopen request for issue 31b [alt-location]
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
- [Bug 16065] New: Consistent attribute value quoting in examples. The examples throughout the HTML5 specification have an inconsistent use of attribute value quoting, this can be observed in particular in the Forms section (4.10). Where one attribute value is surrounded by
- [Bug 16066] New: Use of single solidus character on void elements. Almost all void elements used in the examples throughout the HTML5 specification have no closing single solidus character. In the Start tags section (8.1.2.1) it states that its use has no effect on void e
- [Bug 16067] New: Consistent use of 'no value' attributes. The 'no value' attributes like "selected", "checked" and "required" are being used inconsistently in the examples throughout the HTML5 specifications. Where "required" is always used with no value ('required' vs 'r
- [Bug 16061] New: Required edit should be applicable to fieldset
Wednesday, 22 February 2012
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: MathML and Digital Textbooks
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: CfC: Adopt time syntax changes from
- Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)
- Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-189, was: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- CfC: Adopt time syntax changes from
- Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-189, was: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-196: ua-http-resp-handling - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-193: inaccessible-example - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: autofocus on links is missing?
- [Bug 16051] New: Triggering contextual error message for inputs
Monday, 20 February 2012
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
- Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-170, was: ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid: Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals
Monday, 20 February 2012
- Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- CfC: Close ISSUE-188: generic-track-format by Amicable Resolution
- CfC: Close ISSUE-182 footnote-recommendation by Amicable Resolution
- Re: ISSUE-202: figcaption-words - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs
- Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
- Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
Sunday, 19 February 2012
Saturday, 18 February 2012
Sunday, 19 February 2012
Friday, 17 February 2012
- Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
- Fwd: questions arising from AT vendor in regards to Mozillas implementation of the canvas subdom
- Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
- Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
Thursday, 16 February 2012
- [Bug 16005] New: Media elements: I would suggest that Subtitle support be implemented for Audio Media elements for the hearing impaired users. It should also include an api that would allow custom presentation of the subtitles.
- [Bug 16004] New: Headings and sections (example is incorrect?)
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- [Bug 16001] New: Clarify bidi aspects of <wbr>
- Change proposal for HTML-ISSUE-199
- Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204)
- [Bug 15996] New: How do I solve these errors? # Error Line 2, Column 219: Attribute xmlns:b not allowed here. …www.google.com/2005/gml/data' xmlns:expr='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/expr'> # Warning Line 2, Column 219: Attribute with the local name xmlns:b is not serial
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
Thursday, 16 February 2012
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
- Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- RE: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- ISSUE-80: title-alternative - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2
- ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1
- Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings
- Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204)
- Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204)
- Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204)
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
- Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
- RE: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- ISSUE-131: caret-location-API - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- ISSUE-205: caret-location-API - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
- Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
- Re: ISSUE-205 opened
- Re: ISSUE-205 opened
- Re: ISSUE-205 opened
- Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- Re: ISSUE-205 opened
- ISSUE-205 opened (was: Issue 131 Change Proposal)
- ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated")
- ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element"
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Proposals
Monday, 13 February 2012
- [Bug 15974] New: There are many users of HTML today who are not necessarily document authors. They are CMS users, forum posters, etc. I think it is odd that so many years later we are still using "a href" for links. "Anchor" and "hyper-reference" do not match the vocabula
- Re: ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML
- Re: ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- Re: ISSUE-196: ua-http-resp-handling - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- RE: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194
- Change Proposal for Issue 194
- [Bug 15965] New: add onreadystatechange attribute to index
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
Sunday, 12 February 2012
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
Saturday, 11 February 2012
- RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Re: re-open request for issue 31
- RE: re-open request for issue 31
- re-open request for issue 31
Friday, 10 February 2012
Saturday, 11 February 2012
Friday, 10 February 2012
- Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Issue 131 Change Proposal
- Issue 131 Change Proposals
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: ISSUE-201: Change proposal
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: ISSUE-201: Change proposal
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- ISSUE-201: Change proposal
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- [Bug 15948] New: <area> should be classified as "interactive content"
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Request to Reconsider Meta Generator Alt Exception
Thursday, 9 February 2012
- Re: Request to Reconsider ISSUE-80 Decision
- Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element"
- i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element"
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-170, was: ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid: Chairs Solicit Proposals
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-02-09: issue progress, task force reports, revert request, new information deadline, F2F
- Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
- Re: ISSUE-184: data-element - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- RE: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- Re: Reopen-request - ISSUE-158
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- RE: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- RE: Hyperlink and Metadata
- [Bug 15940] New: W3C websites look dreadful on my android phone. This does not inspire confidence in the material the organisation has to offer. There are numerous typos and other mistakes so it is frankly rather depressing. Never the less I shall attempt to continue read
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Reopen-request - ISSUE-158
- Reopen-request - ISSUE-158
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
- Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
- RE: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- [Bug 15936] New: HTML+RDFa promotes DTD-based validation
Monday, 6 February 2012
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]])
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Split Issue 30?
- Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal)
- Revert Request for r6895
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-177: ietf-id-wip
- Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
Monday, 6 February 2012
- Re: ISSUE-185: drop-pubdate - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- [Bug 15913] New: HTML+RDFa adds href, src, rev and rel attributes to all elements
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
Monday, 6 February 2012
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal
- April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES
- Re: Hyperlink and Metadata
- Re: ISSUE-185: drop-pubdate - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
Sunday, 5 February 2012
- [Bug 15905] New: I wanted to be able to grab the information that Output is using, do some logic to it in my javascript, and send it back. However, apparently the element only returns an empty string when called, so I can't utilize it that way.
- [Bug 15904] New: On: The pattern attribute (forms) The spec does not clarify what the reserved characters of the regular expressions are, and what the escape character is, nor whether there is any. The pattern attribute value example ("[0-9][A-Z]{3}") is a trivial one. Bu
Monday, 6 February 2012
- Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES
- Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES
Saturday, 4 February 2012
- Re: Question about document.referrer (and document.URL, document.location.href) when IDN domains are in use
- Question about document.referrer (and document.URL, document.location.href) when IDN domains are in use
- Re: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal for ISSUE-30
- [Bug 15876] New: HTML5 equivalent of scrollIntoView();
Friday, 3 February 2012
Thursday, 2 February 2012
Friday, 3 February 2012
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: HTML5 and Speech Input
- RE: HTML5 and Speech Input
Thursday, 2 February 2012
- Re: document.write() and .close() allowed on IFRAME though its document.domain was set
- Re: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal for ISSUE-30
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: document.write() and .close() allowed on IFRAME though its document.domain was set
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES
- Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal for ISSUE-30
- Re: Revert Request
- RE: Revert Request
- RE: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES
- Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES
Wednesday, 1 February 2012
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Issue 193 change proposal: Remove CSS example that promotes inaccessible content
- Re: Revert Request
- RE: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Revert Request
- Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request]
- Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request]