Friday, 31 August 2012
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Adopt Issue31cMetaGeneratorUpdated by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- [ISSUE 206] about meta generator
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
Thursday, 30 August 2012
- Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- [Bug 18745] New: Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications
- [Bug 18744] New: drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204
- RE: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- [HTML5 ISSUE-198] WG Decision applied
Wednesday, 29 August 2012
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Re: Adaptive Image Element Proposal
- Adaptive Image Element Proposal
Tuesday, 28 August 2012
- [Bug 18728] New: Example in the <time> element section assumes Microdata
- [Bug 18727] New: First example in the <article> element section assumes Microdata
- [Bug 18726] New: First example in the <nav> element section assumes Microdata
Monday, 27 August 2012
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- [Bug 18711] New: Contents of HTML5+Microdata specification appearing in HTML5 ED
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
Sunday, 26 August 2012
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: [canvas] IDL issue - string quotes
- Re: [canvas] IDL issue - string quotes
- Re: [canvas] IDL issue - string quotes
- Re: [canvas] IDL issue - string quotes
Thursday, 23 August 2012
Saturday, 25 August 2012
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
Friday, 24 August 2012
- [Bug 17765] APIs need to take a reference to blob data underlying object URLs
- [Bug 18680] New: Also use defined character sets for A-Z, a-z, and 0-9 (like with whitespace characters)
- ISSUE-158: Working Group decision applied
Thursday, 23 August 2012
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-150 code-point-verbosity by Amicable Resolution
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Formal Objection on HTML Issue-204 Decision
- Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
- RE: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
Wednesday, 22 August 2012
- Re: WG Decision on ISSUE-199 aria-processing by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-150 code-point-verbosity by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Adopt Issue31cMetaGeneratorUpdated by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- RE: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- CfC: Adopt Issue31cMetaGeneratorUpdated by Amicable Resolution
- CfC: Close ISSUE-131: caret-location-api by Amicable Resolution
- CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
- Updated editors drafts from the new editor teams
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- RE: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- RE: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- RE: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
Tuesday, 21 August 2012
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- RE: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- RE: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
- Updated ISSUE-206 CP
- [HTML5 ISSUE_187] Working Group Decision applied
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- [Bug 18646] New: I18N-ISSUE-92: Provide support for IANA time zone IDs
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: Public Permissive proposed CR exit criteria (was Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: hit regions
- Re: hit regions
- Re: hit regions
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- [Bug 18631] [HTML5] ImageData object as image
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- [Bug 18638] New: Photo view
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision (was RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden))
- why are we pursuing this idea? (was: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision)
- Re: Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision (was RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden))
- Implementation Details request on Issue 204 Decision (was RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden))
Monday, 20 August 2012
- [canvas] IDL issues
- [Bug 18629] New: Why are createLinearGradient/createRadialGradient throwing on NaN/infinity defined in prose, not IDL?
- Re: Draft Decision Policy update
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- RE: hit regions
- Re: hit regions
- Re: hit regions
- RE: hit regions
- Re: hit regions
- RE: hit regions
Sunday, 19 August 2012
- Re: hit regions
- RE: hit regions
- Re: Public Permissive proposed CR exit criteria (was Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5)
- RE: hit regions
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: hit regions
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- hit regions
Saturday, 18 August 2012
- Public Permissive proposed CR exit criteria (was Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
Friday, 17 August 2012
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- [HTML5, Issue 170] Working Group Decision Applied
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
Thursday, 16 August 2012
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: Updating Change Proposals for ISSUE-195 form-http-req
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- [public-html] <none>
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
Wednesday, 15 August 2012
- RE: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Author expectations around aria-describedby and hidden content: an anecdote
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- [Bug 18574] New: @hidden should have a weak mapping to aria-hidden=true
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
Tuesday, 14 August 2012
Wednesday, 15 August 2012
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Other problems, @hidden (ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
Tuesday, 14 August 2012
- CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Draft Decision Policy update
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: Review of ISSUE-164 change proposals - Part 5: Replace <hgroup> with an element that has a simple content model and backwards compatibility
- RE: Issue 131 next steps (was: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-205)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- [Bug 18556] New: 2d.imageData.object.round.html has wrong expectations
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- [Bug 18555] New: title="<white-space>" should not cause a tooltip
- RE: Issue 131 next steps (was: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-205)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- RE: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
- FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)
Monday, 13 August 2012
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden
- Re: Updating Change Proposals for ISSUE-195 form-http-req
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- [Bug 18542] New: onmousewheel attribute should be replaced with onwheel
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
Sunday, 12 August 2012
- Updated change propposal - ISSUE-206/meta generator
- Re: canvas UI library, underscores the use cases for backed regions
- Re: canvas UI library, underscores the use cases for backed regions
Friday, 10 August 2012
Thursday, 9 August 2012
- [Bug 18512] New: Test entry to get to know Bugzilla system - please ignore this bug. [canvas]
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-08-09 - action items, issues, decisions and task force reports
- [Bug 18508] New: Media-type registrations should include clipboard flavor names
- Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
Wednesday, 8 August 2012
- Re: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
- RE: Discussion on ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Review of ISSUE-164 change proposals - Part 4: Remove hgroup add an outlineMask attribute
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- canvas UI library, underscores the use cases for backed regions
Tuesday, 7 August 2012
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
Monday, 6 August 2012
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: Review of ISSUE-164 change proposals - Part 1: Replace hgroup with the subline element
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
Sunday, 5 August 2012
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-189 uri-prefix
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- RE: ISSUE-30: longdesc "LongdescZeroEdit" - outlook
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- [Bug 18490] New: make any element with an explicit lang or dir attribute bidi-isolated by default
Saturday, 4 August 2012
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: CP: role=img trumps empty alt (ISSUE-206: meta-generator)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: CP: role=img trumps empty alt (ISSUE-206: meta-generator)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: CP: role=img trumps empty alt (ISSUE-206: meta-generator)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- CP: role=img trumps empty alt (ISSUE-206: meta-generator)
Friday, 3 August 2012
- Re: Issue 131 next steps (was: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-205)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Issue 131 next steps (was: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-205)
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
Thursday, 2 August 2012
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: Updates to Issue-201 Change Proposal per our conversation
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-205: caret-location-api - and Issue 131
- Editorial team for Canvas 2D Context
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-205: caret-location-api - and Issue 131
- RE: Updates to Issue-201 Change Proposal per our conversation
- {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-08-02 - action items, issues and decisions
- Re: Updates to Issue-201 Change Proposal per our conversation
- RE: Updates to Issue-201 Change Proposal per our conversation
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [Moderator Action] Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: [Moderator Action] Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: [Moderator Action] Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
Wednesday, 1 August 2012
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution
- RE: Review of ISSUE-164 change proposals - Part 4: Remove hgroup add an outlineMask attribute
- Re: Review of ISSUE-164 change proposals - Part 4: Remove hgroup add an outlineMask attribute
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: Better alts on Flickr? [Was: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Better alts on Flickr? [Was: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- RE: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- Re: img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]
- img@relaxed CP [was: CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution]