Saturday, 30 April 2011
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- [Bug 12577] New: Offline Web applications: we should discourage the inclusion of the main page in the manifest
- [Bug 12576] New: Need clarification on tokenization of html 5 doc.
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- [Bug 12575] New: add "is a boolean attribute" to definition of muted attribute for the video element
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
Friday, 29 April 2011
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- RE: Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Re: Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Re: Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Re: Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Re: Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Change made to WAI-ARIA section
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Bug 11239
- RE: PDF as normative reference (was RE: HTMLImageElement -- use of SVG within <canvas>)
- [Bug 12570] New: Missing normative reference to PDF
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: PDF as normative reference (was RE: HTMLImageElement -- use of SVG within <canvas>)
- [Bug 12569] New: "Resource" Package Support
- PDF as normative reference (was RE: HTMLImageElement -- use of SVG within <canvas>)
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: HTML5 Licensing Preference Poll: Which license should be used for the W3C HTML5 specifications?
- Re: HTMLImageElement -- use of SVG within <canvas>
- Re: HTMLImageElement -- use of SVG within <canvas>
- Re: HTML5 Licensing Preference Poll: Which license should be used for the W3C HTML5 specifications?
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
Thursday, 28 April 2011
- Re: Bug 11239
- HTMLImageElement -- use of SVG within <canvas>
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Need to: "preload" CSS and JS
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: HTML5 Licensing Preference Poll: Which license should be used for the W3C HTML5 specifications?
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: HTML5 Licensing Preference Poll: Which license should be used for the W3C HTML5 specifications?
- Clearer decisions?
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Applying the ISSUE-131 decision
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- RE: GPL and DFSG Compatibility of Proposed Document Licences
- Re: Bug 11239
- Re: Bug 11239
- [Bug 12568] New: A diagram might be helpful.
- [Bug 12567] New: "return the value obtained using the following steps" doesn't specify that it refers to "determine the value of a named property" in WebIDL
- HTML5 Licensing Preference Poll: Which license should be used for the W3C HTML5 specifications?
- Re: Bug 11239 proposed patch
- Re: Bug 11239
- GPL and DFSG Compatibility of Proposed Document Licences
- Bug 11239
- Re: question about the meta-generator exception
- Re: question about the meta-generator exception
- Re: question about the meta-generator exception
- Re: Bug 11239 proposed patch
- question about the meta-generator exception
- Re: RE : Metadata access
- RE : Metadata access
- Re: Metadata access
- [Bug 12566] New: draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie published as RFC 6265
- Re: Bug 11239 proposed patch
- [Bug 12565] New: This section should clarify whether the following code should work: 'document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].setAttribute("manifest", "offline.manifest");'
- Bug 11239 proposed patch
Wednesday, 27 April 2011
- [media] Minutes - sub-team conference call 27 April 2011
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Mozilla Second Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: Revised draft HTML5 license survey
- Re: Revised draft HTML5 license survey
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Revised draft HTML5 license survey
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- [Bug 12564] New: This, for me is definately the way to go with text tracks. Since the text is embedded in the media file "In-Band" it means the content never gets lost. This is how we treat audio with video and is how DVD treated text too. Some devices such as iOS may not
- Working Group Decision on Issue-152 multitrack-media-resources: Closed without Prejudice
- [Bug 12563] New: Make standard to play these codecs in <video>
- [Bug 12562] New: ARIA role example used as a conformance error is not a conformance error in HTML5
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- [Bug 12561] New: Add the @action in the <form> so that there is a way to submit to the same page
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- Re: Applying the ISSUE-131 decision
- Re: Applying the ISSUE-131 decision
- Re: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- RE: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Applying the ISSUE-131 decision
- RE: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- RE: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- RE: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- RE: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- RE: ISSUE-152 survey and Last Call schedule
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Revised draft HTML5 license survey
Tuesday, 26 April 2011
- Re: Metadata access
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- [Bug 12560] New: Not sure if this is the right place for such a comment, but although support for an external text file for subtitles or captions is a great addition to the standard I would also recommend that display of embedded track data already injected into the media
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: CP is incoherent, and the decision is a vague change to the CP
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: longdesc spec text
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- longdesc spec text
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- [Bug 12559] New: Make paused true at playback end
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: CP is incoherent, and the decision is a vague change to the CP
- RE: CP is incoherent, and the decision is a vague change to the CP
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- tooltip listed under Don’t Use Unsupported iOS Technologies
- RE: Metadata access
- Re: Metadata access
- RE: Metadata access
- Re: Metadata access
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- [Bug 12557] New: add heading to the list of allowed roles for hx's
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- [Bug 12556] New: Define how currentTime is updated in terms of tasks
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- RE: CP is incoherent, and the decision is a vague change to the CP
- [Bug 12555] New: The informative note has contents that should be clearer in the normative text. Namely, a regular expression with alternate branches (a|ab) will match the string 'ab' in a more "greedy" way if compiled as the informative note suggests. As-is, implementat
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
Monday, 25 April 2011
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- RE: longdesc - beside the box
- RE: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Fwd: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- Re: longdesc - beside the box
- longdesc - beside the box
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
Sunday, 24 April 2011
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- [Bug 12551] New: In the sentence "To help users with this [...]", the word "dilineate" should read "delineate". Moreover, the parenthetic remark "(non-conforming)" before the words "layout table" should be removed, as layout tables are now conforming (discouraged, but all
Saturday, 23 April 2011
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- [Bug 12550] New: testing javascript bug; please ignore this message.
- [Bug 12549] New: At 7:07 AM (Saturday, April 23, 2011 at 12:07:00 PM UTC) the link to the "html-letter.pdf" document provides a PDF file that cannot be loaded (by Chrome or by OS X Preview). The "html-a4.pdf" is fine and can be loaded; just the "html-letter.pdf" is broke
- FW: [media] proposed a11y TF letter on issue-152
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- [Bug 12548] New: MEDIA CONTROLLER requires onended event
- [Bug 12547] New: MEDIA CONTROLLER requires readyState for grouped multitrack
- [Bug 12546] New: MEDIA CONTROLLER requires autoplay attribute for grouped multitrack
- [Bug 12545] New: MEDIA CONTROLLER requires loop attribute for grouped multitrack
- [Bug 12544] New: MEDIA CONTROLLER requires track kind for in-band tracks
- FW: Issue-152 (multitrack-media-resources): Call for Consensus
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- [Bug 12543] New: Replacing backslash with forward slash in URIs doesn't seem to be necessitated by web compat
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
Friday, 22 April 2011
- RE: Accessibility Task Force consensus on Issue-152, media multitrack
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- [Bug 12541] New: The asynchronous behaviour of steps 5-12 causes unexpected, unwanted behaviour when getting the currentTime immediately after it's been set. http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-January/029961.html
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Draft HTML5 licensing survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Issue-152 (multitrack-media-resources): Call for Consensus
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Issue-152 (multitrack-media-resources): Call for Consensus
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: Issue-152 (multitrack-media-resources): Call for Consensus
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- RE: Issue-152 (multitrack-media-resources): Call for Consensus
- RE: Issue-152 (multitrack-media-resources): Call for Consensus
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- Issue-152 (multitrack-media-resources): Call for Consensus
- [Bug 12539] New: The numeric references to produce the gyphs in the third column should use the characters listed in the second columns. lang (and aliases) list (correctly) U+27ea, but the glyph is produced by #9001 (U+2329) which is not in normal form C and generates va
- Re: False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- Re: Accessibility Task Force consensus on Issue-152, media multitrack
- Accessibility Task Force consensus on Issue-152, media multitrack
- [Bug 12538] New: Need a name attribute for the toppings?
- False aria-describedby expectations in ARIA Authoring Practices (longdesc)
- RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
Thursday, 21 April 2011
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- RE: device independent title attribute support in browsers
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Browser inconsistencies in implementing name getters on forms and form element collections
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- [Bug 12537] New: Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
Wednesday, 20 April 2011
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Wednesday, 20 April 2011
- [Bug 12536] New: measureText() needs to return the height as well as the width.
- Re: device independent title attribute support in browsers
- Re: device independent title attribute support in browsers
- Re: Newly-created browsing contexts and about:blank
- Re: device independent title attribute support in browsers
- [Bug 12533] New: Being able to control what the user agent is creating on a command would be useful. Otherwise I have to listen to DOM mutation events or parse my editable text to find out.
- [media] CP relating to bug 11207
- [Bug 12532] New: Asp.net is the best way to work
- RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12531] New: Change the way that select tag and its height works
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12530] New: Make TrackList an Array-like list of Track objects and move get* into those
- [Bug 12529] New: Fix HAVE_METADATA and HAVE_CURRENT_DATA when seeking and at playback end
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- [Bug 12527] New: no formal definition for allowed id syntax
- [Bug 12526] New: image verbiage
- [Bug 12525] New: Probably several of these are not good indicators. I think at least <th> and cellspacing/cellpadding are not good indicators. Needs more research.
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- [Bug 12524] New: It would be nice if you could see the pretty glowing lines
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: New approach to HTML Media Capture
- New approach to HTML Media Capture
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- clarifications to issue 31 title as conforming when alt is omitted
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- device independent title attribute support in browsers
- Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey)
- [Bug 12523] New: Meow meow, meow. Meow? mOew.
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
Monday, 18 April 2011
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 requirements survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey - formal objection to the title being conforming
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 requirements survey
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey - formal objection to the title being conforming
- Re: Issues the chairs overlooked in their review of the canvas accessibility API proposal for Issue 131
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 requirements survey
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 verbiage survey
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey
- [Bug 12521] New: The document.readyState authoring usage note doesn't match the implementation requirements
- [Bug 12520] New: Why the word dirty for the arguments to putImageData? Normally, dirty refers to something that has changed, and I think that connotation infers that the rectangle may not be copied if it hasn't changed. However, that is not the case, as far as I can tell
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- [Bug 12519] New: prova commento per capire il funzionamento
- Re: Browser inconsistencies in implementing name getters on forms and form element collections
- [Bug 12518] New: why is there a section on XHTML in an HTML spec? unless you are going to provide a way to use it. in HTML... I guess I don't understand.
- [Bug 12517] New: from the wording here, it sounds like this whole 3.2.3.4 section belongs in the XML spec not the HTML spec. so why is it here if I must not use it in HTML documents? This /is/ an HTML spec after all...
- [Bug 12516] New: Only a box is seen in 'Glyph', not a letter.
- [Bug 12515] New: Only a box is seen in 'Glyph', not a letter.
Sunday, 17 April 2011
- RE: [Moderator Action] Re: author-only view of HTML5 and ACTION-190
- [Bug 12514] New: This section is non-normative. In order to enable users to continue interacting with Web applications and documents even when their network connection is unavailable â for instance, because they are traveling outside of their ISP's coverage area â
- [Bug 12513] New: add specification for <meta name="viewport" ...>
- Re: [Moderator Action] Re: author-only view of HTML5 and ACTION-190
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
Saturday, 16 April 2011
- [Bug 12512] New: Section facets selected
- RE: author-only view of HTML5 and ACTION-190
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- [Bug 12511] New: ) what was previously the HTML5, HTML4, XHTML1, and DOM2 HTML specifications.
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
Friday, 15 April 2011
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Issues the chairs overlooked in their review of the canvas accessibility API proposal for Issue 131
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Issues the chairs overlooked in their review of the canvas accessibility API proposal for Issue 131
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- [Bug 12508] New: Unclear how to handle <link href> when the href value is only whitespace
- [Bug 12507] New: <html b:version='2' class='v2' dir='ltr'>
- [Bug 12506] New: There is no border element, should be table
- HTML5: The Markup Language Reference-Comments
- [Bug 12505] New: step 9, step 4, the node is set before or after?
- [Bug 12504] New: lame super lame
- Re: Browser inconsistencies in implementing name getters on forms and form element collections
- Re: Browser inconsistencies in implementing name getters on forms and form element collections
- [Bug 12503] New: Complex Ruby needs to be added to the specification: http://www.w3.org/International/articles/ruby/
- [Bug 12502] New: Note about 1-to-1 relationship if (inner) Window and Document contradicts normative prose
- [Bug 12501] New: Describe the loop attribute on <marquee>
- [Bug 12500] New: "Previous Versions" not updated
- [Bug 12499] New: I think it would be better if required attribute wasnt boolean type. This attribute should set text, which is showed when textfield is required.
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
Thursday, 14 April 2011
- [Bug 12498] New: <audio> and <video> are missing muted="" in the element summary table
- [Bug 12497] New: "allow-top-navigation" is missing from the valid values of "sandbox" in the attribute summary table
- [Bug 12496] New: "muted" is missing from the attribute summary table
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Issues the chairs overlooked in their review of the canvas accessibility API proposal for Issue 131
- Re: Issues the chairs overlooked in their review of the canvas accessibility API proposal for Issue 131
- [Bug 12495] New: please mark the reference to RFC1345 as non-normative
- Issues the chairs overlooked in their review of the canvas accessibility API proposal for Issue 131
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12492] New: In the article element definition, the nested article exemple should use <ol>
- [Bug 12491] New: This section is useful for authors. Don't hide it behind class=impl (maybe hide just "that must be")
- Browser inconsistencies in implementing name getters on forms and form element collections
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification
- Re: editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification
- Re: editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- [Bug 12490] New: potential conflict between Link: and <link> semantics
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border
- [Bug 12489] New: Conversion example of Julian/proleptic Greogrian date issues
- RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
- [Bug 12488] New: Use <time> to add publishing dates for the docs of the Reference section.
- Re: Longdesc - broader UA implementation (was: longdesc)
- Re: Longdesc - broader UA implementation (was: longdesc)
- Re: Longdesc - broader UA implementation (was: longdesc)
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- [Bug 12487] New: It's not so clear how editability interacts with non-HTML elements. If an HTML element has contenteditable=true and its parent is a non-HTML element, is the HTML element an editing host? (The spec implies no, which seems wrong.) If an HTML element is e
- [Bug 12486] New: "Editable" would be simpler if you defined it recursively, like: "An HTML element is editable if either its contenteditable attribute is set to the true state, or it is the root element of a Document that has designMode enabled, or its contenteditable att
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12485] New: Should the TrackList, MultipleTrackList and ExclusiveTrackList be NoInterfaceObjects?
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12484] New: typo in http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5995&to=5996
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12483] New: No provision for allowing the UA to remember muted state of videos
- [Bug 12482] New: When is a media element created?
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- RE: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- [Bug 12481] New: PDF print versions: Letter: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/html-letter.pdf I trie to open this link in Microsoft IE Browser 9 with Adobe X 10.0.1; Call back from browser sted this PDF file was damaged. In other words the file would not
- [Bug 12480] New: PDF print versions: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/html-letter.pdf
- [Bug 12479] New: The intro indicates that this spec is what "used to be" HTML5, but there are still references to "version 5" (This specification defines version 5 of DOM HTML) which is now more confusing than when it _was_ HTML 5 and version 5 of the DOM. Is the DOM real
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- RE: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12477] New: The abstract does not match the contents, as there does not seem to by any reference to a video element anywhere except in the abstract.
- Re: Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- [Bug 12476] New: Trying to build forms it's disappointing that you can't wrap a form element around most table elements like rows, headers or footers, for example. That prevents you from easily creating submit inputs (like save and delete) for each individual data record
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- [Bug 12475] New: Implemented in Opera 11.10 - http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-speed-dial-enhancements/
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- RE: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- feedback requested: Canvas change for improved hit testing that also facilitates accessibility (resending larger fonts)
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
Monday, 11 April 2011
- Re: feedback requested: Canvas change for improved hit testing that also facilitates accessibility
- Re: Proposal for Audio and Video Track Selection and Synchronisation for Media Elements
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- RE: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129
- Correction Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- [Bug 12473] New: The abstract of the Living Standard⢠multipage spec should remove the <device> element reference to match the kitchen sink spec.
- Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- RE: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence
- Re: Proposal: Authentication Forms
- Re: Proposal: Authentication Forms
- Re: Proposal: Authentication Forms
- Proposal: Authentication Forms
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12472] New: RANKING AND OPTIMIZATION OF LEGAL FORMS SITE
- [Bug 12471] New: Please consider changing the expected rendering of abbr[title] and acronym[title] to use border-bottom instead of text-decoration: dotted underline, which has much more limited support (being in CSS3 Text, not CSS 2.1), conflicts with existing browser def
- Re: changes to headings in ARIA in HTML5
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12470] New: In the last paragraph, please add the word "vertical", since the intent is apparently that _vertical_ margins at the top or bottom of body, td, or th elements be collapsed to zero. That's what browsers do in quirks mode. But horizontal margins are honored
- [Bug 12469] New: Dynamic Cross-Site Scripting and Page Repainting
- Re: changes to headings in ARIA in HTML5
- mistakes in WAI-ARIA section of HTML5
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- request to the HTML WG Chairs on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping
Sunday, 10 April 2011
- [Bug 12468] New: This could be more precise for <font size=7>. CSS 3 Fonts says that the corresponding size is 3.0em, so why not say that here too?
- [Bug 12467] New: dfsdfasd asdf adf
- Re: changes to headings in ARIA in HTML5
- Re: changes to headings in ARIA in HTML5
- Re: How to get Content-Type?
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- How to get Content-Type?
- [Bug 12466] New: Why the word pop? Seems so ambiguous. I would have gone with statechange, or historychange. I'd like to know the reason behind the decision for popstate?
- Request to reopen ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes (was: Working Group Decision)
Saturday, 9 April 2011
- [Bug 12465] New: Can it be added that the poster image (if defined) should continue to show until video is played for the first time? Safari currently shows the first frame of the video as soon as it's available (when preloading) while other browsers continue to show the
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12463] New: html5 web form
- changes to headings in ARIA in HTML5
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- [Bug 12462] New: no pueden poner en opera un MEJOR ''status bar''(o como se llame) para ver la velocidad y como va la pagina al subir???
- [Bug 12461] New: no pueden poner en opera un MEJOR ''status bar''(o como se llame) para ver la velocidad y como va la pagina al subir???
- [Bug 12460] New: no pueden poner en opera un MEJOR ''status bar''(o como se llame) para ver la velocidad y como va la pagina al subir???
- [Bug 12459] New: no pueden poner en opera un MEJOR ''status bar''(o como se llame) para ver la velocidad y como va la pagina al subir???
Friday, 8 April 2011
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-144 conforming-u
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-147 playbackrate-undefined
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-144 conforming-u
- [Bug 12456] New: On some web-hostings authors cannot use/manage real HTTP headers. So there must be an opportunity to point out some more "http-equiv" document properties: media (content-)type - application/xhtml+xml, 'cache-control', perhaps 'last-modified' and 'expires'
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: prefixes vs full URIs, Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- prefixes vs full URIs, Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-27 rel-ownership
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- [Bug 12453] New: dfgdfg fgfdgfdgdfgdfg ddsfd dfds dfsfdfd sdfsfds fdsfds dsf dsfdsf
- [Bug 12452] New: Make sure acknowledgements are updated
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- [Bug 12449] New: The definition of the IDL attribute text is misleading, since the syntax allows only text inside a title element. The attribute should be defined as a synonym for innerText (for this element). Existing browsers treat markup inside title element as charact
- [Bug 12448] New: The style element (Korean description error) scoped ìì±ì´ "ìë" ê²½ì°: íë¡ì° 컨í ì¸ If the scoped attribute is present: flow content. ì¤íì ëë¤. scoped ìì±ì´ ìë ê²½ì° flow contentê° ë©ëë¤.
- [Bug 12447] New: history.pushState / replaceState's title parameter is unsatisfactory
- [Bug 12446] New: should make sure we define that if you pushState() or replaceState() on a non-GET-like resource, it turns into a GET-like resource (e.g. for reload purposes)
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
Thursday, 7 April 2011
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- [Bug 12444] New: Canvas rendering should be done in linear color space (gamma 1) and the result displayed in sRGB color space (approximately gamma 2.2)
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: ISSUE-27 survey feedback, was: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: ISSUE-27 survey feedback, was: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: ISSUE-27 survey feedback, was: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Participating in the development of the HTML standard
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2011-04-07: Issues, Surveys, Decisions and Publications
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- [Bug 12443] New: DataTransfer's setData() and clearData() should return booleans
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: ISSUE-27 survey feedback, was: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: raising hgroup as an issue
- Re: raising hgroup as an issue
- Re: raising hgroup as an issue
- role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup
- Re: ISSUE-27 survey feedback, was: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- raising hgroup as an issue
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- Re: Request for HTML.next ideas
- Re: Request for HTML.next ideas
- Re: [whatwg] Request for HTML.next ideas
- Re: [whatwg] Request for HTML.next ideas
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- [Bug 12442] New: I think that for the first level of article h1 {â¦}, the size should be left as normal. For example, If I start my article immediately after the body then I would put an h1 in with the title of the document on the page, often followed by an h2 with a sub
Wednesday, 6 April 2011
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Longdesc - broader UA implementation (was: longdesc)
- RE: example spec text for longdesc
- [Bug 12441] New: Can arg1 of drawImage be just Element? If so, it can capture some of rendered subtree elements.
- [Bug 12440] New: This should block every Document member, not just HTMLDocument, unless specified otherwise elsewhere.
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- RE: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Request for HTML.next ideas
- Fwd: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "archives"
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes
- RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12437] New: Change <video src="ogg"></video> to <video src="example.webm"></video>
- [Bug 12436] New: Fix heading in changelogs section
- [Bug 12435] New: remove simonp from acks
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Systematic access to media/plugin metadata
- [Bug 12434] New: Spec doesn't match IE when calling insertAdjacentHTML with position afterend or beforebegin on head or body
- [Bug 12432] New: Would it be fair to say that making html5 documentation available in a convenient compressed archive would not be such a difficult task for a great big organization like w3c? And wouldn't it also be fair to say that even the famous w3c has a lame web serv
- RE: CfC: Publish eight heartbeat drafts as WDs
- RE: CfC: Publish a first public WD
- [Bug 12431] New: possible typo: newlines inside tags
- [Bug 12430] New: possible typo: newlines inside tags
- [Bug 12429] New: Should cloning properties preserve configurability, readonlyness, etc?
Tuesday, 5 April 2011
- [Bug 12427] New: User interface of spatial media fragment URI in <img> or <video> resource, or in browser navigation
- [Bug 12426] New: 4. Effect when @src of video element contains temporal media fragment URI and @loop
- [Bug 12425] New: User interface of temporal media fragment URI in @src of video element
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-32 table-summary
- Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-32 table-summary
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: feedback requested: Canvas change for improved hit testing that also facilitates accessibility
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- [Bug 12424] New: Setting .value on a textarea should set the dirty flag to true
- [Bug 12423] New: Setting .value on a textarea should set the dirty flag to true
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-32 table-summary
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- [Bug 12422] New: ewrwerweewf wefw ef
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- [Bug 12419] New: According to the spec, the term âGarage Door Openerâ, not âGDOâ is being defined in the example.
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
Monday, 4 April 2011
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- feedback on ISSUE-27 survey feedback, Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections
- ISSUE-27 survey feedback, was: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- RE: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: example spec text for longdesc
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
Sunday, 27 March 2011
Monday, 4 April 2011
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- [Bug 12418] New: "dispatched when" for seeking event is out of sync with normative text
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- [Bug 12417] New: HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content
- Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections
- [Bug 12416] New: isEnabled in exclusive track lists should probably be renamed to something like selectedIndex or selectedTrack.
- Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- [Bug 12415] New: this should not be unsigned long if it has to return -1 in case nothing is selected.
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- [Bug 12414] New: Does the srclang imply a lang attribute for the track element? If that's the idea, please say it explicitly. Otherwise, please add lang attributes to the example of a video element with track attributes, as the label attribute values should have their lan
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- [Bug 12413] New: Handling of <table border=0> is incompatible with the Web
- [Bug 12412] New: As specified, video can't be disabled. This is needed for "video mute". Suggested solution: Move "enable" and "disable" from MultipleTrackList to TrackList.
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
- Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code
Sunday, 3 April 2011
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: W3C should drop bespoke licenses, adopt CC0 + OWFa instead (was Re: HTML License Options for Discussion)
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
- RE: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")
Friday, 1 April 2011
Saturday, 2 April 2011
- Re: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]
- Working Group Decision on ISSUE-161 accessibility-api-mapping by Amicable Resolution
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]
- Re: Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]
- [Bug 12410] New: fillText needs stricter definitions so that it's 100% uniform
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]
- Responses to objections to the Microformats rel registry CP
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]
Friday, 1 April 2011
- [Bug 12409] New: Automatic capitalization in input fields
- Re: W3C should drop bespoke licenses, adopt CC0 + OWFa instead (was Re: HTML License Options for Discussion)
- Re: W3C should drop bespoke licenses, adopt CC0 + OWFa instead (was Re: HTML License Options for Discussion)
- Re: Working Group Decision on 142 poster-alt
- RE: W3C should drop bespoke licenses, adopt CC0 + OWFa instead (was Re: HTML License Options for Discussion)
- [Bug 12408] New: review comment tool buggy. help button mostly hidden off right edge of screen. purpose of button labeled "27A1" unclear.
- Re: W3C should drop bespoke licenses, adopt CC0 + OWFa instead (was Re: HTML License Options for Discussion)
- Re: W3C should drop bespoke licenses, adopt CC0 + OWFa instead (was Re: HTML License Options for Discussion)
- W3C should drop bespoke licenses, adopt CC0 + OWFa instead (was Re: HTML License Options for Discussion)