Sunday, 30 May 2010
Saturday, 29 May 2010
Friday, 28 May 2010
- [Bug 9773] There is not a clear difference between "subtitles" and "captions". These are mostly used to describe "closed captions" (binary transmissions in TV broadcasts) vs "subtitles" (text files), as far as I know.
- [Bug 9774] "consecutive lines displayed below each other" - since subtitles tend to be rendered at the bottom, it's actually better for new subtitles to be rendered higher up. Of course, the individual lines of each subtitle still extend downwards, but it's still po
- [Bug 9775] "positioned to a multiple of the line dimensions of the first line of the cue" - enforcing the same line height for every line ihurts text rendering appearance for no apparent reason. This is especially true if text styling is supported (bold text is larg
- [Bug 9804] "the alt attribute must be specified" so are you saying ALT is required?
- [Bug 9817] Details element Focus problem
Thursday, 27 May 2010
- Call for Exclusions: HTML Microdata
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-05-27
- ISSUE-103, ISSUE-107, was: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-05-27
Tuesday, 25 May 2010
- Re: HTML5 Profiles - First Editors Draft
- Re: HTML5 Profiles - First Editors Draft
- Re: HTML5 Profiles - First Editors Draft
- Re: HTML5 Profiles - First Editors Draft
- Re: HTML5 Profiles - First Editors Draft
- Re: HTML5 Profiles - First Editors Draft
Monday, 24 May 2010
Sunday, 23 May 2010
Saturday, 22 May 2010
Friday, 21 May 2010
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: Open video for an open web
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
Thursday, 20 May 2010
- Re: Grouping in Definition Lists
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
- Re: CfC: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs
- Re: HTML5 Feedback: Event bubbling and various event handler DOM attributes
- Re: HTML5 Feedback: Interoperable connectivity events firing?
- Re: HTML5 Feedback: Interoperable connectivity events firing?
- HTML5 Feedback: Interoperable connectivity events firing?
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: Applying design to W3C specs
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- HTML5 Feedback: Event bubbling and various event handler DOM attributes
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- RE: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- RE: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- RE: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- RE: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155]
- Re: Applying design to W3C specs
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155]
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: [http-state] Initiating WG Last Call: draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-08
- Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: comments on the polyglot spec
- IE's condition for ignoring document.write()
- [Bug 8116] URNs are URIs but not URLs
- Clarification on Calls for Counter-Proposals for ISSUE-85, ISSUE-101, ISSUE-105
- I18N feedback on Issue-88
- Re: Applying design to W3C specs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- [Bug 8116] URNs are URIs but not URLs
Tuesday, 18 May 2010
- RE: Grouping in Definition Lists
- comments on the polyglot spec #2
- comments on the polyglot spec
- Re: CfC: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs
- Re: Change definition of URL to normatively reference IRI specification using a well-defined interface
- CfC: Adopt ISSUE-86 Change Proposal to remove Atom conversion
- CfC: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: Applying design to W3C specs
- Re: Applying design to W3C specs
- RE: Applying design to W3C specs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- RE: Applying design to W3C specs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
Monday, 17 May 2010
- Applying design to W3C specs
- Re: use cases for polyglot/biglot documents (was Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs)
- Re: use cases for polyglot/biglot documents (was Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs)
- Re: change proposal for issue-86, was: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- use cases for polyglot/biglot documents (was Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs)
- Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives
- Re: ... deadlines
- Re: Request for extensions for the upcoming change proposal deadlines
- Re: Request for extensions for the upcoming change proposal deadlines
- Re: Request for extensions for the upcoming change proposal deadlines
- Re: Request for extensions for the upcoming change proposal deadlines
- Request for extensions for the upcoming change proposal deadlines
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: Timed tracks
Sunday, 16 May 2010
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
Saturday, 15 May 2010
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- ISSUE-96 implementation experience
- Comments on HTML5 proposals from the DCMI community
- Re: change proposal for issue-86, was: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
Friday, 14 May 2010
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
Thursday, 13 May 2010
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- RE: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- Re: World-readable issue survey results
- World-readable issue survey results
- Re: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: //head/object
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- ISSUE-97 - Removing the progress Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- ISSUE-96 - Removing the progress Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: Timed tracks
- ISSUE-95 - Removing the hidden Attribute - Straw Poll for Objections
- ISSUE-93 - Removing the details Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- ISSUE-91 - Removing the aside Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- [Bug 6606] generic 3rd-party <mark>, Smart Tags, and Accelerators prevention
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: //head/object
- RE: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: [I18N] questions about date-local
- [I18N] questions about date-local
- [Bug 7681] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same person across many sites
- [Bug 7682] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same organization across many sites
- [Bug 6610] add a preventable forced-fragment method
- [Bug 6609] negative keywords-not meta tags
- [Bug 9160] input['type=checkbox'].checkValidity ought to work like the radio type, testing the whole checkbox group, not each checkbox individually
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics - Straw Poll for Objections
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: Question on Iframe sandbox attribute and allow-forms keyword
- Re: Question on Iframe sandbox attribute and allow-forms keyword
- Question on Iframe sandbox attribute and allow-forms keyword
- RE: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Canceled [Was: Call for Exclusions - HTML: The Markup Language]
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- RE: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- srt mentions in w3c/html space Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: HTML charter and Timed tracks
Monday, 10 May 2010
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
Sunday, 9 May 2010
- [Bug 8872] split out and modify parts of Section 4.8.2.1 the img element
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
Saturday, 8 May 2010
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-32 Table-Summary
- RE: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
Friday, 7 May 2010
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- ISSUE-27, was: Protocol Action: 'Web Linking' to Proposed Standard
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- RE: Prep for Heartbeat Drafts
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: //head/object
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- [Bug 9678] add rationale for providing an alt when inline description is available
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- HTML charter and Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- Re: Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
Thursday, 6 May 2010
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Request to publish HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives as a first public working draft
- RE: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- RE: Timed tracks
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: Gloss standard terminology for resource/representation (ISSUE-81 Change Proposal)
- New components for HTML5-related specs
- Re: ISSUE-27, was: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09.txt
- [Bug 5756] Need interactive UA norms for exposing (non-displayed) HTML document data
- Re: //head/object
- Re: Prep for Heartbeat Drafts
- Re: Prep for Heartbeat Drafts (HTML+RDFa)
- Re: HTML+RDFa 1.1 (working on new heartbeat WD)
- RE: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-85: (anchor-roles): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-101: (us-ascii-ref): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: Timed tracks
- Re: ISSUE-85: (anchor-roles): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-85: (anchor-roles): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: ISSUE-105: (canvas-usemap): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- RE: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)
- Re: Prep for Heartbeat Drafts
- ISSUE-105: (canvas-usemap): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- ISSUE-101: (us-ascii-ref): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- ISSUE-85: (anchor-roles): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Prep for Heartbeat Drafts
- Prep for Heartbeat Drafts
- Re: ISSUE-106 (obsconf): Chairs Solicit Proposals
- Re: Gloss standard terminology for resource/representation (ISSUE-81 Change Proposal)
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-82 profile-disambiguation by amicable resolution
- Preparing for Surveys - Ground Rules
- Re: Grouping in Definition Lists
- [Bug 7670] Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: //head/object
- Re: ISSUE-107 Change Proposal: Replace <object> fallback example
Tuesday, 4 May 2010
- Re: //head/object
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- Re: //head/object
- [Bug 9215] Provide a Webcam example that is in accord with WCAG 2 or Defer to "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives"
- [Bug 9216] Provide a CAPTCHA example that is in accord with WCAG 2 or Defer to "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives"
- [Bug 9098] Correct the img element definition. Replace with suggested text.
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- Grouping in Definition Lists
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- Re: //head/object
- Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
- RE: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
Monday, 3 May 2010
- Re: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUES-90, 91, 93, 95, 96, & 97
- RE: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- Re: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- RE: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- Re: //head/object
- Re: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- Re: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- ACTION-177 - Open a bug about HTML elements mapping to ARIA and A11y APIs
- Re: ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- ISSUE-41: Creating a JavaScript DataGrid Widget
- Re: //head/object
- Re: ISSUE-41: Facebook open graph protocol
- Re: //head/object
- Re: //head/object
- Re: //head/object
- Re: HTML+RDFa 1.1 (working on new heartbeat WD)
- //head/object
- HTML+RDFa 1.1 (working on new heartbeat WD)
- Re: ISSUE-93 Details change proposal discussion
- Re: ISSUE-93 Details change proposal discussion
- Re: ISSUE-93 Details change proposal discussion
- Re: ISSUE-93 Details change proposal discussion
Sunday, 2 May 2010
- Re: ISSUE 90 Remove figure element discussion
- Re: ISSUE-93 Details change proposal discussion
- ISSUE 90 Remove figure element discussion
- ISSUE-93 Details change proposal discussion
Saturday, 1 May 2010
- Re: document.load: History and a proposal
- Change <figcaption> to <summary>
- [Bug 9623] <details> and <summary> are missing from the "strong aria semantics" table
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-82 profile-disambiguation by amicable resolution
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-82 profile-disambiguation by amicable resolution
- RE: ISSUES 90, 91, 93, 96, 97 -- if you DON'T support these change proposals, support zero-change instead