public-html@w3.org from August 2010 by date

Tuesday, 31 August 2010

• Re: [Bug 10479] add role=radiogroup to details element Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 10518] Add example showing how to use <a> elements in image maps bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10478] modify table, tr and td roles bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10479] add role=radiogroup to details element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10481] Default role of <IMG> should be "img" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10484] default roles for figcaption and caption: Make it simple to achieve accessibility bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10485] The img element with non-empty alt should default to the img aria role bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10486] References to "image" ARIA role should be "img" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10493] "ARIA restricts usage of this role to one per page" is an unclear statement bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10494] modify aria example and fix spelling bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10496] fix error in aria conformance checker advice bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• {Announcement} Media accessibility user requirements overview, Thu Sep 2 Paul Cotton
• Re: Update "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 9280] Add default button option/attribute for forms bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9215] Provide a Webcam example that is in accord with WCAG 2 or Defer to "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9216] Provide a CAPTCHA example that is in accord with WCAG 2 or Defer to "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9326] HTML elements mapping to ARIA and A11y APIs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9214] Allow role="presentation" img as conformance Criteria bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9212] Change the Generator Mechanism for img from Document Level to Element Level bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9113] re: "axis on td and th elements" text could say "Use the scope attribute on the relevant th" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9098] Correct the img element definition. Replace with suggested text. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 8885] Fallback mechanism for embedded content bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 8872] split out and modify parts of Section 4.8.2.1 the img element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9061] allow image maps on the canvas element. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 8000] ARIA roles added to the a element should be conforming in HTML5 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10252] HTML5 hard-binds "Action" to accesskey key-press bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10251] Psuedo-Cascade of Multiple Accesskeys Definable for an Individual Element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10251] Psuedo-Cascade of Multiple Accesskeys Definable for an Individual Element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10252] HTML5 hard-binds "Action" to accesskey key-press bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10077] The <embed> should support an alt attribute. While the embedded content should provide for accessilibility of the embedded object, the developer doesn't always have control over those content, some embeddable formats are inherently less accessible, and th bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10249] Canvas requires a content selection method bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10248] Canvas requires a Caret Drawing call method bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10066] replace section 3.2.6 with the alternative spec text provided (ARIA) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9623] <details> and <summary> are missing from the "strong aria semantics" table bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 30 August 2010

• Re: method for providing programmatically associated long description Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 29 August 2010

• [Bug 10480] add role="presentation" on the ASCII fish image bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 28 August 2010

• [Bug 8554] <progress> element should be labelable with a label bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 8144] Is a 'visibility: hidden' element being rendered? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 8747] Defining how a license applies to elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Bug 8747 Michael Cooper
• DOM Level 3 Events Last Call schedule Paul Cotton

Friday, 27 August 2010

• [Bug 10462] merge ARIA mapping tables and list bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10463] provide a comprehensive HTML5 to accessibility API mapping reference bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10464] provide clear user friendly links to WAI-ARIA documents in the ARIA section of the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10465] provide correct aria mapping and role info for the table element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10467] provide headings in the WAI-ARIA section of the spec to make it easier to understand bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 26 August 2010

• Re: link relation metadata considerations, also ACTION-186 Julian Reschke
• RE: Media Accessibility User Requirements Published Paul Cotton
• [Bug 10444] ARIA section does not list elements that have no default role or role restrictions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Media Accessibility User Requirements Published Janina Sajka
• [Bug 10452] Consider documenting attributes that map to ARIA properties in a separate table bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10451] Consider restricting the roles allowed for the label element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10450] Allow lists to be used as menus or tab sets bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10449] Consider allowing various command-like ARIA roles for h1-h6 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10448] Consider broadening the set of allowed roles for command elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10447] <output> should have no role by default instead of status role bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10446] Consider limiting the roles of certain media and plugin elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10445] Certain elements with no role should have that as a strong semantic bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Joshue O Connor
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Steven Faulkner
• [Bug 10441] <link> that represents a hyperlink should probably have no role by default bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10440] menu type=context should have "menu" role bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10439] <input type=file> has "button" role, but is typically a compound control bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10438] math should be changed changed from no role to "math" role bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Sam Ruby
• RE: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? John Foliot

Wednesday, 25 August 2010

• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Simpson, Grant Leyton
• ISSUE-117 (deprecate-noscript): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work? Sam Ruby
• rel="longdesc" (was: providing a long description using the summary and details elements.) Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. John Foliot
• Re: method for providing programmatically associated long description Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. John Foliot
• Re: method for providing programmatically associated long description Steven Faulkner
• Re: method for providing programmatically associated long description Steven Faulkner
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Laura Carlson
• RE: Formal Objection to ISSUE-30 (Was: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30.) Paul Cotton
• Re: method for providing programmatically associated long description Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Leif Halvard Silli
• method for providing programmatically associated long description Steven Faulkner
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Steven Faulkner
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Steven Faulkner
• Input values across type changes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Leif Halvard Silli

Tuesday, 24 August 2010

• Re: More ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Laura Carlson
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Laura Carlson
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Laura Carlson
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Leif Halvard Silli
• More ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Laura Carlson
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Steven Faulkner
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Steven Faulkner
• providing a long description using the summary and details elements. Steven Faulkner
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Smylers
• HTML5 Suggested UIs for making title attribute content accessible Steven Faulkner
• Why is there a rendering rule for col[valign] ? L. David Baron
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• RE: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases John Foliot
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• RE: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases John Foliot

Monday, 23 August 2010

• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• RE: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases John Foliot
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Jonas Sicking
• Formal Objection to ISSUE-30 (Was: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30.) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases David Singer
• ISSUE 30 @longdesc use cases Joshue O Connor
• MathML3 Proposed Recommendation David Carlisle

Sunday, 22 August 2010

• [Bug 10068] Suggest making noscript obsolete but conforming bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• SVG and CSS thoughts from Doug S - FYI Lars Gunther
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Ian Hickson
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• [Bug 10412] restriction of "bookmark" to <a>/<area> is arbitrary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Ian Hickson
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 21 August 2010

• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Ian Hickson
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: link relation metadata considerations, also ACTION-186 Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Tantek Çelik
• WHATWG IRC chat about link relations (ISSUE-27) Julian Reschke
• Re: Status of Leif's Appeal / Issue 30 Objections Sam Ruby

Thursday, 19 August 2010

• Action-55 - ARIA in HTML5 draft text and change proposal Steven Faulkner
• Status of Leif's Appeal / Issue 30 Objections John Foliot
• RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2010-08-19: WG decisions, Decision Policy, TF reports Adrian Bateman
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Joshue O Connor

Wednesday, 18 August 2010

• [Bug 9214] Allow role="presentation" img as conformance Criteria bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9212] Change the Generator Mechanism for img from Document Level to Element Level bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 17 August 2010

• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Ian Hickson
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Sam Ruby
• [Bug 7543] Consensus on ietf-http-wg was that repetition of relations is meaningless and we should rather use numbering (e.g. "up2"), names (e.g. "great-grandparent") or an attribute (e.g. level="3"). bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10172] nofollow/noreferrer not allowed on <link> bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Ian Hickson
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry David Singer
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Silvia Pfeiffer
• [Bug 9845] provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• ISSUE-27 and microformats process, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: change proposal: Specification of authoring conformance requirments in HTML5 Joshue O Connor
• ISSUE-116, was: change proposal: Specification of authoring conformance requirments in HTML5 Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Lachlan Hunt
• [Bug 9845] provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• change proposal: Specification of authoring conformance requirments in HTML5 Steven Faulkner
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Tantek Çelik
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg] Using BugZilla for non-W3C spec issues Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Using BugZilla for non-W3C spec issues Julian Reschke
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc John Foliot

Monday, 16 August 2010

• Re: Update on Issue-27, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Silvia Pfeiffer
• [Bug 7475] Semantics of rel=first and rel=index breaks specs and implementations bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10068] Suggest making noscript obsolete but conforming bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10276] change spellcheck IDL attribute back to boolean bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Ian Hickson
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry David Singer
• ISSUE-27, was: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 10332] Shipping browsers don't have form.action reflect the DOM attribute exactly. Specifically, if the content attribute is the empty string, they generally return "" on an IDL get, not the current address. This contradicts the spec, but it would be confusing bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10366] please ban <input type=file> if the form's enctype is application/x-www-form-urlencoded, as this seems an authoring error bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 15 August 2010

• ISSUE-27, Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Julian Reschke
• Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry Jirka Kosek
• Report on testing of the link relations registry Ian Hickson
• Re: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Leif Halvard Silli

Saturday, 14 August 2010

• RE: ISSUE-109: aria-section-title - Straw Poll for Objections John Foliot
• Re: ISSUE-109: aria-section-title - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• RE: ISSUE-109: aria-section-title - Straw Poll for Objections John Foliot
• Re: ISSUE-4: html-versioning / ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Straw Poll for Objections Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) John Foliot
• Re: ISSUE-4: html-versioning / ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Straw Poll for Objections Adam Barth
• Re: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Leif Halvard Silli

Friday, 13 August 2010

• Re: ISSUE-4: html-versioning / ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Straw Poll for Objections Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: Update on Issue-27, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Paul Cotton
• Re: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Paul Cotton
• Re: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Denis Boudreau
• Re: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Philippe Le Hegaret
• Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30. Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-4: html-versioning / ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Straw Poll for Objections Robin Berjon
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Leif Halvard Silli
• link relation metadata considerations, was: Update on Issue-27, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Re: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Re: Update on Issue-27, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• RE: Update on Issue-27, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Paul Cotton
• Update on Issue-27, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Aurelien Levy
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Karl Dubost
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 12 August 2010

• Re: <select> element @size default Jonas Sicking
• <select> element @size default Mike Taylor
• Re: ISSUE-4: html-versioning / ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Straw Poll for Objections Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ISSUE-4: html-versioning / ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Straw Poll for Objections Robin Berjon
• ACTION-103, Re: some conformance questions Julian Reschke
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Ian Hickson
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Sam Ruby

Wednesday, 11 August 2010

• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Tony Ross
• Re: ISSUE-100 and convergence of specs Aryeh Gregor
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-109: aria-section-title - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• Working Group Decision on ISSUE-30 longdesc Sam Ruby
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Steven Faulkner
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Steven Faulkner
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Julian Reschke
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Julian Reschke
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-100 and convergence of specs Sam Ruby

Tuesday, 10 August 2010

• Re: ISSUE-100 and convergence of specs Aryeh Gregor
• Re: [html5] r5258 - [e] (0) Some more references to UTF-8. Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-110 sandbox-type-owner - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: [html5] r5258 - [e] (0) Some more references to UTF-8. Tab Atkins Jr.
• ISSUE-100 and convergence of specs Julian Reschke
• Re: [html5] r5258 - [e] (0) Some more references to UTF-8. Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Laura Carlson
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Julian Reschke

Monday, 9 August 2010

• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Steven Roussey
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Julian Reschke
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Steven Roussey
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Steven Faulkner
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 8 August 2010

• Re: thoughts about a visible caret Daniel Glazman
• request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 Steven Faulkner
• [Bug 10301] HTMLOptionElement.text should not be identical to .textContent - causes interop issues with web content bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10306] Why is <01> not OK? It would make the parser simpler and allows zero-padding when using more than 9 voices. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10132] A CanvasPattern object should have a way to offset the repitition of an image. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Steven Faulkner
• Re: thoughts about a visible caret Ian Hickson

Saturday, 7 August 2010

• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Laura Carlson
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: thoughts about a visible caret Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Laura Carlson
• Re: Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Steven Faulkner
• thoughts about a visible caret Daniel Glazman
• Specific points of controversy relating to alt text (ISSUE-31, ISSUE-80) Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 6 August 2010

• Re: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Karl Dubost

Thursday, 5 August 2010

• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Mark Nottingham
• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Jonas Sicking
• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Edward O'Connor
• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Re: link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Edward O'Connor
• RE: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Carr, Wayne
• RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2010-08-04 [task force week] Adrian Bateman
• link relation "external", was: Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Link relation types and validity in <link>, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 4 August 2010

• Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Tantek Celik
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Edward O'Connor
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Tab Atkins Jr.
• ISSUE-100: srcdoc - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Jonas Sicking
• ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates Paul Cotton
• Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• ISSUE-110 sandbox-type-owner - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group Eric Carlson
• Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [Bug 9785] Add a "filter" attribute. If set, the user agent will filter the datalist. If not, filter won't be filtered automatically (unless you do some sort of filtering by javascript or/and server-side) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9741] enctype, formenctype, method and formmethod IDL attributes should be limited to only known values bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9726] Spec the features argument bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9584] drawImage() shouldn't throw INVALID_STATE_ERR bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9663] Should sequences of bytes be replaced by a single U+FFFD, or one U+FFFD per input byte? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9649] It doesn't look like any browser supports document.innerHTML bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9602] That autofocus attribute will wreak security havok. What an ignorant idea to bring more logic to HTML. I think I know a couple of ways to abuse it, since it actually is some sort of flow control, which only scripting languages should be capable of. I hope bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9579] An element should not suffer from pattern mismatch if the pattern attribute value is the empty string bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9577] Define the x and y attributes. Both Gecko and WebKit have them and apparently some sites depend on them :/ bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9573] spec input.onsearch bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9546] computing atom:updated bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9542] Recommended rendering for table alignment does not match reality bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9514] Specify Selection.modify() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9452] Handling of additional tracks of a multitrack audio/video resource bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9439] UA should not change values of input elements in telephone state bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 7543] Consensus on ietf-http-wg was that repetition of relations is meaningless and we should rather use numbering (e.g. "up2"), names (e.g. "great-grandparent") or an attribute (e.g. level="3"). bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 9578] On http-state it was mentioned that browsers support Set-Cookie here. Ugh! bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9797] <meta http-equiv="Link"> not addressed by spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• <meta http-equiv="Link"> question Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 3 August 2010

• [Bug 10066] replace section 3.2.6 with the alternative spec text provided bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 2 August 2010

• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Henri Sivonen
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Henri Sivonen
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Jirka Kosek
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: i18n Polyglot Markup/Encodings Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Tantek Çelik
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: i18n Polyglot Markup/Encodings Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 1 August 2010

• Re: Form error messages and default presentation of invalid state Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Kornel Lesiński
• Re: Polyglot Markup/XML encoding declaration Leif Halvard Silli

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 August 2010 23:31:36 UTC