public-html@w3.org from September 2009 by date

Wednesday, 30 September 2009

• Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility Philip Taylor
• Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility Jonas Sicking
• RE: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility Adrian Bateman
• Integrated Philip Taylor's RDFa tests for XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 Manu Sporny
• RE: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force janina@rednote.net
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 7776] rename appcache events? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7765] Maybe progress should be named fetchcachefile or some such bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: CfC: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force Paul Cotton
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. Manu Sporny
• RE: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. Paul Cotton
• Re: [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Call for volunteers: Testing task force facilitator Paul Cotton
• Call for volunteers: Accessiblity task force facilitator Paul Cotton

Tuesday, 29 September 2009

• CfC: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force Maciej Stachowiak
• CfC: Create Testing Task Force Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• [Bug 7760] appcache event summary for error is wrong bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7757] The "application cache update process" does not take a browsing context as argument. Do you mean the pass the active document as cache host? It should be more explicit about what is what. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7759] The "application cache update process" does not take a single application cache as argument. It takes an application cache group. This means the "If document was loaded from an application cache" step is wrong. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Toby Inkster
• [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7734] open being an attribute of the section rather than the content area means you can never use this to mark up content which has multiple control/detail areas which are opened or closed independently like tabs or accordion bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7735] perhaps open could be an int rather than boolean, indicating which content area was open to make using this model for tabs easier bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7736] add tooltip attribute & keep title for other uses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7740] Authoring advice for canvas is bad for accessibility bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7744] Is sniffing required? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7746] <link rel=search> should be used instead of <input type=search> for backwards-compatibility and beacuse the search input type poses no additional input restrictions. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• [Bug 7633] The use of @summary should be encouraged when circumstances warrant bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7512] suggested "replacement" for head/@profile does not work bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7657] Redefining dt and dd bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Mark Birbeck
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta

Monday, 28 September 2009

• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Roy T. Fielding
• New Scripting Coordination List Set Up Doug Schepers
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Nikunj R. Mehta
• [Bug 7011] [in off-bug discussion] canvas accessible fallback provision is under specified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Philip Taylor
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Karl Dubost
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Mark Birbeck
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• Re: Localized decimal separator for numbers in <meter> textContent Elliott Sprehn
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Doug Schepers
• Localized decimal separator for numbers in <meter> textContent Elliott Sprehn
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Larry Masinter
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) Manu Sporny

Sunday, 27 September 2009

• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Cross posting madness must stop. Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Cross posting madness must stop. Mark S. Miller
• Fwd: Cross posting madness must stop. Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Cross posting madness must stop. Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Mark S. Miller
• Fwd: Web IDL Garden Hose Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Robin Berjon
• Cross posting madness must stop. Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose Brendan Eich
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• Very nice talk about HTML5 Dailey, David P.
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) Julian Reschke
• W3C process: was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination ~:'' ありがとうございました
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Cameron McCormack
• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Removing <source> should make resource selection not fire 'error' on it Ian Hickson
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Cameron McCormack
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Allen Wirfs-Brock

Saturday, 26 September 2009

• Re: WebIDL Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Oliver Hunt
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Cameron McCormack
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Oliver Hunt
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Cameron McCormack
• Re: WebIDL Cameron McCormack
• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: WebIDL Ian Hickson
• Re: WebIDL Ian Hickson
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: WebIDL Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker Manu Sporny
• Re: WebIDL Brendan Eich
• Re: WebIDL Yehuda Katz
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Yehuda Katz
• Re: WebIDL Brendan Eich
• Re: WebIDL Yehuda Katz
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: WebIDL Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: WebIDL Brendan Eich
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Yehuda Katz
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: WebIDL Yehuda Katz
• Re: WebIDL Cameron McCormack
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Cameron McCormack
• Re: WebIDL Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: WebIDL Cameron McCormack
• Re: WebIDL Cameron McCormack
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Yehuda Katz
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Mark S. Miller
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Mark S. Miller
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Mark S. Miller
• Re: WebIDL Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Yehuda Katz
• WebIDL Yehuda Katz
• RE: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 25 September 2009

• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Krzysztof Maczyński
• RE: <keygen> element Dundas, Alan
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Cameron McCormack
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Jonas Sicking
• RE: aria mappings Cynthia Shelly
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Jonas Sicking
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Jonas Sicking
• RE: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Robin Berjon
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Mark S. Miller
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Sam Ruby
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Sam Ruby
• Re: ACTION-137 on URI/IRI/URL Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Yehuda Katz
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Cameron McCormack

Thursday, 24 September 2009

• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose Doug Schepers
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Yehuda Katz
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Yehuda Katz
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Yehuda Katz
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Brendan Eich
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) Doug Schepers
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Sam Ruby
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Sam Ruby
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ACTION-137 on URI/IRI/URL Jonas Sicking
• Re: Protocol feature sets and specification clarity Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Maciej Stachowiak
• ACTION-137 on URI/IRI/URL Larry Masinter
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination James Graham
• ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination Sam Ruby
• [Bug 7542] Remove Section 5. Microdata bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7687] Use "representation" instead of "resource" in �6.9 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7688] 'input type=time' forbids legitimate use case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7689] Cache-defeating semantics are not defined bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7690] Incompletely defined priority of fallback over explicit entries bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6853] restore meta keywords, search engines use them bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7704] It is better to implement canvas.clear() method and allow to resize canvas without clearing it bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: How to track issues that block PR but not Last Call (was Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-13: handling-http-401-status - suggest closing on 2009-08-20 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: declare WebSockets out of scope Maciej Stachowiak
• Protocol feature sets and specification clarity Larry Masinter
• Re: aria mappings Steven Faulkner
• Re: aria mappings Jim Jewett
• Re: aria mappings Nick Fitzsimons
• [Bug 7715] Tests not archived bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 23 September 2009

• RE: HTML WG Testing Task Force Adrian Bateman
• Re: Pre-TPAC HTML5 Video Accessibility Workshop November 1 David Singer
• additional aria native semantics Jim Jewett
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and Leif Halvard Silli
• (aria-*) role and other values Jim Jewett
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and Leif Halvard Silli
• aria and multiple roles Jim Jewett
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: aria mappings Jim Jewett
• Aria-* vs html attributes and reflection Jim Jewett
• RE: Pre-TPAC HTML5 Video Accessibility Workshop November 1 John Foliot
• WindowProxy James Graham
• Re: section/article grouping and CSS [was: Re: what is dt?] Tab Atkins Jr.
• section/article grouping and CSS [was: Re: what is dt?] Jim Jewett
• RE: <keygen> element Dundas, Alan
• Re: What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? Jeff Schiller
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? Sam Ruby
• Re: What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? Anne van Kesteren
• What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? Jeff Schiller
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and Shelley Powers
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka
• draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter for IRI Larry Masinter
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Philip Taylor
• [Bug 7709] Prevent PUT/DELETE cross-origin bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Charles McCathieNevile
• Pre-TPAC HTML5 Video Accessibility Workshop November 1 Laura Carlson
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Philip Taylor
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

• RE: <keygen> element Dundas, Alan

Wednesday, 23 September 2009

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: aria mappings Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: aria mappings Jim Jewett
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Boris Zbarsky
• Re: itemheader names <h> Jim Jewett
• Re: itemheader names <h> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aria mappings Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: itemheader names <h> Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: itemheader names <h> Jim Jewett
• aria mappings Jim Jewett

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Tab Atkins Jr.
• FW: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. Paul Cotton
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• RE: Accessibility Task Force Paul Cotton
• Re: itemheader names <h> Aryeh Gregor
• Re: itemheader names <h> Tab Atkins Jr.
• itemheader names <h> Jim Jewett
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Toby Inkster
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Shelley Powers
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Tab Atkins Jr.
• [Fwd: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD] Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Bug 7470 -- mention aria-* attributes in element definitions. Jim Jewett
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Philip Taylor
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: On testing HTML Philip Taylor
• HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Sam Ruby
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Mark Birbeck
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: The Complexity Argument Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron

Monday, 21 September 2009

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• proposed update to IRI document posted Larry Masinter
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) Steven Rowat
• [TAG post:] "Ten Use-Cases of Individual Content Authors Requiring Rights/Commerce Metadata..." Steven Rowat
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) Steven Rowat
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Moving Form Events from DOM3 Events to HTML5 (was: Removing Form Events?) Doug Schepers
• Resending Re: Application Cache review Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa James Graham
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Drag and Drop API Steven Faulkner
• Drag and Drop API James Graham
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Aryeh Gregor
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa James Graham
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• [Bug 7682] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same organization across many sites bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7681] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same person across many sites bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7362] inclusion of the title as a case where the alt may be omitted is problematic bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Sunday, 20 September 2009

• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. Ian Hickson
• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. Lars Gunther
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) Ian Hickson
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• RE: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) John Foliot
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) Steven Rowat
• Re: what is dt? Smylers
• Re: what is dt? Smylers
• Re: [whatwg] fyi: Strict Transport Security specification Giorgio Maone
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 7400] "as part" instead of "sa part" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) Leif Halvard Silli
• Reopening bugs (Was: The Complexity Argument) Ian Hickson
• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. Ian Hickson
• [Bug 7674] are the chunks for inputs having the content-type header for each chunk specified appropriately? e.g. file inputs should set the header according to the file selected by the user bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7677] Is there any behavior defined for setting the src property. For example, is the expectation that object should (A) load the src if autobuffer is true (B) stop playing if currently playing (C) something else (D) nothing at all? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Michael A. Puls II
• [Bug 7680] Add an 'angle' element to HTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Steven Rowat

Saturday, 19 September 2009

• fyi: Strict Transport Security specification =JeffH
• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Ian Hickson
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Michael A. Puls II
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. Ian Hickson
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Ian Hickson
• [html5] input type=time & min/max. Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Serialization of PI misses ending question mark Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Ian Hickson
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Ian Hickson
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Jonas Sicking
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Leif Halvard Silli

Friday, 18 September 2009

• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 David Singer
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Krzysztof Maczyński
• The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) Manu Sporny
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Shelley Powers
• dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Shane McCarron
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Lachlan Hunt
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Simon Pieters
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Lachlan Hunt
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft Karl Dubost
• [Bug 7659] Clarify what "other applicable specifications" means to say http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Sep/0045.html bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: what is dt? Jeremy Keith
• [Bug 7672] </p> shouldn't be ignored in "before html", "before head", "in head", "in head noscript", "after head". It should be reprocessed through to "in body" like </br>. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7662] When images are disabled arguably fallback content of the <canvas> element should be shown. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7668] 7.9.6 should explain which events are actually dispatched when copying/cutting/pasting bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7669] Redefining dt and dd, recommend new element as caption for Figure bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: what is dt? Lachlan Hunt
• [Bug 7670] Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Bindings instead of video, audio, canvas and img Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 17 September 2009

• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft Jonas Sicking
• CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: what is dt? Jeremy Keith
• Re: what is dt? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force Jonas Sicking
• On testing HTML Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: DIALOG Issues Which Have Already Been Submitted as Proposals (includes DL) Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: what is dt? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: DIALOG Issues Which Have Already Been Submitted as Proposals (includes DL) Leif Halvard Silli
• DIALOG Issues Which Have Already Been Submitted as Proposals (includes DL) Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: what is dt? Maciej Stachowiak
• X3D references for HTML5 draft Don Brutzman
• Re: what is dt? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Smylers
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Philip Taylor
• Re: what is dt? Smylers
• Re: what is dt? Smylers
• ACTION-127: establish process for "official WG response" to other WG's RFC on LC drafts Paul Cotton
• <summary> [was: Re: what is dt?] Jim Jewett
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? use of summary in Figure Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Henri Sivonen
• Re: what is dt? James Graham
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Henri Sivonen
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Laura Carlson
• Re: what is dt? use of summary in Figure Shelley Powers
• RE: HTML WG Testing Task Force Paul Cotton
• Re: what is dt? Simon Pieters
• Re: what is dt? Simon Pieters
• ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Lachlan Hunt
• Removing <source> should make resource selection not fire 'error' on it Simon Pieters
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? focusing on Figure Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• [Bug 7660] The resource selection algorithm should set currentSrc in the sync section before invoking resource fetch instead of being set in the async resource fetch. Otherwise checking currentSrc in onloadstart is not reliable. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7632] Should resource selection algorithm be run when src="" is removed? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: what is dt? Laura Carlson
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• Re: what is dt? Henri Sivonen
• Re: what is dt? Bruce Lawson
• Re: what is dt? Henri Sivonen
• Re: what is dt? Bruce Lawson
• Re: what is dt? Lars Gunther
• Re: what is dt? Bruce Lawson
• Re: what is dt? Jeremy Keith
• Re: what is dt? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: what is dt? Jeremy Keith
• [Bug 7628] The later 'block' box container should simply map to the first/last dd element. This makes UA implementations easier and script emulation of the feature in contemporary UAs as well. Both can simply toggle the display property between block and none. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: <keygen> element Adrian Bateman
• [Bug 7629] When the dd element is used inside figure and details it should probably not have margin by default. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7631] Don't invoke resource selection algorithm when inserting <source> if src="" is present bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7633] The use of @summary should be encouraged when circumstances warrant bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7646] Media Queries bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7649] It would be useful to see an example of how section works when it's not in the context of an article, in the example text (chapters, tabs, etc) all of those would sit inside a wrapping article element. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7651] Articles and sections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7656] Describe differences between easily confused new elements to assist authors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7599] Either drop the two places that set the "Origin" HTTP header, or update HTML5 to match the Sec-From/Origin I-D (if the latter is stable enough yet). bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: what is dt? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 7657] Redefining dt and dd bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 16 September 2009

• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-09-17 Sam Ruby
• IDNA, IRI, HTML5 coordination Larry Masinter
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Jim Jewett
• Re: head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Laura Carlson
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Henri Sivonen
• Re: Google to pay for HTMLWG invited experts at TPAC 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: what is dt? Masataka Yakura
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: <details> Ian Hickson
• Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD Manu Sporny
• Speakers in Dialogues; citations Jim Jewett
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: what is dt? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] Jim Jewett
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• [Bug 7643] Why not use display:none instead of overflow:hidden; height:0? display:none seems to have the desired behavior in terms of exposure to AT and keyboard navigation in browsers. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7642] which attribute wins if both pointsize and size are specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7645] associate printable pages and less-convenient-to-print pages with link rel value "print" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Charles McCathieNevile
• Conformance of SVG content in HTML Cameron McCormack
• Re: <keygen> element Ian Hickson
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 15 September 2009

• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) Stephen Stewart
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) Edward O'Connor
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) Eric Eggert
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) Ian Hickson
• RE: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) John Foliot
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Stephen Stewart
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) Smylers
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) Smylers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Jeremy Keith
• Re: what is dt? Jeremy Keith
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Lars Gunther
• Re: what is dt? Stephen Stewart
• please don't cross-post to the pfwg-comments (Was: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support]) James Craig
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: what is dt? Jonas Sicking
• Re: what is dt? Jeremy Keith
• RE: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] John Foliot
• [Bug 7639] Please remove "dc" and "ds" from the parser bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] Laura Carlson
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] Lachlan Hunt
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] Steven Faulkner
• aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] Jim Jewett
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft Jim Jewett
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Jonas Sicking
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Jonas Sicking
• RE: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support John Foliot
• what is dt? Jim Jewett
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Laura Carlson
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Jonas Sicking
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Jonas Sicking
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft Laura Carlson
• Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support Laura Carlson
• Re: what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft Aryeh Gregor
• Re: what is dt? Smylers
• what is dt? Shelley Powers
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Martin McEvoy
• Re: <details> Smylers
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: <details> Toby Inkster
• Re: <details> Lachlan Hunt
• Re: <details> Bruce Lawson
• Re: <details> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <details> Toby Inkster
• Re: <details> Ian Hickson
• Re: [html] Summary draft Henri Sivonen
• Re: [html] Summary draft Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: [html] Summary draft John Foliot
• Re: [html] Summary draft Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [html] Summary draft Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: [html] Summary draft John Foliot
• Re: [html] Summary draft Sam Ruby
• Re: [html] Summary draft Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [html] Summary draft Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: FW: [html] Summary draft John Foliot
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft Ian Hickson

Monday, 14 September 2009

• Re: [html] Summary draft Maciej Stachowiak
• FW: [html] Summary draft Cynthia Shelly
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state Ian Hickson
• Re: <keygen> element Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 Philip Jägenstedt
• [Bug 7615] Whitespace in doctype bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7616] Move requirement about obsolete doctypes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ] Jim Jewett
• Re: guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ] Anne van Kesteren
• guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ] Jim Jewett
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state Thomas Broyer
• Re: Feature detection (was: <details>) Jeremy Keith
• Re: <details> Simon Pieters
• Re: <details> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <details> Toby Inkster
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 James Graham
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state Ian Hickson
• <details> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Jeremy Keith
• Re: [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Ian Hickson
• Re: <keygen> element Ian Hickson

Friday, 11 September 2009

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Lord Armitage

Monday, 14 September 2009

• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 Ian Hickson
• Re: [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." Silvia Pfeiffer
• [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." Steven Rowat

Sunday, 13 September 2009

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Toby Inkster
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Karl Dubost
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Karl Dubost
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Mark Birbeck
• Re: aria-role vs role -- from SVG Steven Faulkner
• aria-role vs role -- from SVG Jim Jewett

Saturday, 12 September 2009

• Re: Pedagogic validation Simon Pieters

Friday, 11 September 2009

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Smylers
• Re: Pedagogic validation Smylers
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Bruce Lawson
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Dan Connolly
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Bruce Lawson
• Re: Pedagogic validation Lars Gunther
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Smylers
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Bruce Lawson
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Bruce Lawson
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Dan Connolly
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Sam Ruby
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka

Thursday, 10 September 2009

• Clarification of application of same origin policy for data:/javascript: URIs in Web Workers requested nemo@m8y.org

Friday, 11 September 2009

• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force Karl Dubost
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Sam Ruby
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Sam Ruby
• Re: Pedagogic validation Thomas Broyer
• RE: Example of Good Summary??? Schnabel, Stefan
• Re: The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) Smylers
• The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka
• Example of Good Summary??? Jim Jewett
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Laura Carlson
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Smylers
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Smylers

Thursday, 10 September 2009

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) T.V Raman
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) T.V Raman
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: how many URL issues do we need/want? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Edward O'Connor
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> Smylers
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Sam Ruby
• RE: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) T.V Raman
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Laura Carlson
• Re: Pedagogic validation Simon Pieters
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Sam Ruby
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Laura Carlson
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Laura Carlson
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Michael Cooper
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Michael Cooper
• Change back the semantics of <cite> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Michael Cooper
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force Dan Connolly
• Re: how many URL issues doe we need/want? Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10 - Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc Maciej Stachowiak
• how many URL issues doe we need/want? Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10 - Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc Dan Connolly
• Re: Pedagogic validation Smylers
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Lars Gunther
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Leif Halvard Silli
• Scripts that promise not to document.write() Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Steven Faulkner
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Thomas Broyer
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-73 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Toby Inkster
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Toby Inkster
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Thomas Broyer
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Jonas Sicking
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Jonas Sicking
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Jonas Sicking
• CfC: declare WebSockets out of scope Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 7551] People are using <section> incorrectly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• [Bug 7556] Where is it defined that only the first <base> element is to be taken into account? Surely that should not be part of iri-bis. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) John Foliot
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Robert O'Callahan

Wednesday, 9 September 2009

• Re: Pedagogic validation Laura Carlson
• Pedagogic validation Lars Gunther
• ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) Edward O'Connor
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Toby Inkster
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Toby Inkster
• [Bug 7557] add "type" attribute to <nav> distinguish between primary and secondary navigation bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Accessibility Task Force Janina Sajka
• Re: <keygen> element Jonas Sicking
• ISSUE-73 (was: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10) Sam Ruby
• FW: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10 - Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc Paul Cotton
• HTML WG Testing Task Force Paul Cotton
• RE: Accessibility Task Force Paul Cotton
• Example of Good Summary Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Stephen Stewart
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information Stephen Stewart
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• [Bug 7550] The invalid event does have a default action. Namely to display UI. However, UAs should probably not be forbidden to show that a field is invalid before submitting, but how can page author suppress the UI for that? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: <keygen> element Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• [Bug 7547] on .drawImage() negative widths or heights should flip/mirror the image. There's no easy way of fliping images in canvas bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7546] "HTML 5" Editor's draft misnamed and suboptimal for HTML content authors unless refactored into HTML (main) and DOM API (appendix). bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: <video> and <audio> Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 7543] Consensus on ietf-http-wg was that repetition of relations is meaningless and we should rather use numbering (e.g. "up2"), names (e.g. "great-grandparent") or an attribute (e.g. level="3"). bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7542] Remove Section 5. Microdata bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7540] Spec for metadata extensions does not define which states are allowed/conforming bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7527] Allow implementations to generate meaningful default, implied headings for some sections. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7525] meta/@name=keywords should be specified (and made conforming) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7512] suggested "replacement" for head/@profile does not work bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7510] Allow elements beyond just HTML, MathML, and SVG into SVG element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

• RE: <keygen> element Adrian Bateman
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Jonas Sicking
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Jonas Sicking
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: <keygen> element Adrian Bateman
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Boris Zbarsky
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• RE: <video> and <audio> Adrian Bateman
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Lachlan Hunt
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Michael Hausenblas
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Jonas Sicking
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Boris Zbarsky
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Boris Zbarsky
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Thomas Pike
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• <dialog> bugs (was: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers)) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state Julian Reschke
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state Thomas Broyer
• [Bug 7392] Please use some term other than "URL" for Web Addresses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state Julian Reschke
• Re: <keygen> element Jonas Sicking

Monday, 7 September 2009

• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Jeff Schiller
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Sam Ruby
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Lachlan Hunt
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Boris Zbarsky
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Jeff Schiller
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Lachlan Hunt
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Sam Ruby
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Simon Pieters
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Philip Taylor
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Jeff Schiller
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n Ivan Herman
• XMLLiterals and c14n (was: HTML+RDFa (2nd draft)) Philip Taylor
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Sam Ruby
• Re: <video> and <audio> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <keygen> element Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Ian Hickson
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Ian Hickson
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Ian Hickson
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages James Graham
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: Authoring Requirements for Using SVG and MathML in HTML Documents Henri Sivonen
• HTML+RDFa (2nd draft) Manu Sporny
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 6 September 2009

• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages Aryeh Gregor
• More on SVG within HTML pages Shelley Powers
• Re: [HTML5] DOMContentLoaded fires before CSS resources loaded? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Aryeh Gregor
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Leif Halvard Silli
• Authoring Requirements for Using SVG and MathML in HTML Documents Lachlan Hunt
• Re: <keygen> element Sam Ruby
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Jonas Sicking
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Ian Hickson

Saturday, 5 September 2009

• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Julian Reschke
• Re: <keygen> element Sam Ruby
• Re: <keygen> element Julian Reschke
• Re: <keygen> element Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <keygen> element Sam Ruby
• Re: <keygen> element Anne van Kesteren
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Mark Baker
• Re: <keygen> element Sam Ruby
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Philip Taylor
• Re: <keygen> element Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <keygen> element Lachlan Hunt

Friday, 4 September 2009

• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Where people have discussions (was Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars) Sam Ruby
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Where people have discussions (was Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars Aryeh Gregor
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: The History of <aside> for sidebars John Foliot
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars Lachlan Hunt
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Jonas Sicking
• RE: The History of <aside> for sidebars John Foliot
• Re: tweaking meter Ian Hickson
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars Aryeh Gregor
• Re: meter changes [was: Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5] Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Aryeh Gregor
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm Ian Hickson
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• RE: The History of <aside> for sidebars John Foliot
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Ian Hickson
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Stephen Stewart
• [Bug 7499] <keygen> should not be defined as a requirement for a conforming HTML5 user agent and should be removed from the spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (was: Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Philip Taylor
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (was: Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers) Bruce Lawson
• The History of <aside> for sidebars (was: Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Joshue O Connor
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: <keygen> element Jonas Sicking
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Steven Faulkner
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa James Graham
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Bruce Lawson
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Joshue O Connor
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Ian Hickson
• Re: <keygen> element Ian Hickson
• Re: [html5] Event handler DOM attributes Jens Meiert
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers James Graham
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Issues arising from not reparsing Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Jonas Sicking
• Re: The formatblock command Ian Hickson

Thursday, 3 September 2009

• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? Ian Hickson
• Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev" Ian Hickson
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Boris Zbarsky
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Boris Zbarsky
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? Dan Connolly
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? Edward O'Connor
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? Dan Connolly
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Sam Ruby
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? Maciej Stachowiak
• what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? Dan Connolly
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Sam Ruby
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Martin Kliehm
• Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev" James Graham
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Philip Taylor
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• [Bug 7491] Unspecified: quotation punctuation in the blockquote element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Martin Kliehm
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Sam Ruby
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Jim Jewett
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Bruce Lawson
• [Bug 7484] head/@profile holds a white-space separated list of URIs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7483] The footer element desperately needs to be able to contain sectioning content descendents, most importantly "nav". Under the current specification, I will just end up using div class="footer" so my footers can contain sectioning content. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Anne van Kesteren
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev" Ian Hickson
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Steven Faulkner
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 Ian Hickson
• Re: video: earliest possible position changes Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Toby Inkster
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Henri Sivonen
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Steven Faulkner
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Toby Inkster
• Re: Proposal: <content> element James Graham
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Ian Hickson
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-08-20 - Accessibility TF, HTML5 Test Suite, etc Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Henri Sivonen
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-08-20 - Accessibility TF, HTML5 Test Suite, etc Lachlan Hunt
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Ian Hickson
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Mark Baker
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 2 September 2009

• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Jonas Sicking
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Jonas Sicking
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: [html5] Event handler DOM attributes Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Ian Hickson
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: drawImage() shouldn't throw INVALID_STATE_ERR Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal: <content> element Ian Hickson
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Lars Gunther
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Steven Faulkner
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Lars Gunther
• Re: <keygen> element Sam Ruby
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Jim Jewett
• RE: <keygen> element Adrian Bateman
• Elements used to scope <address> Chris Cressman
• [aapi] RE: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA Cynthia Shelly
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: closing issue-30 longdesc in favor of aria-describedby [was: Consolidated issues ...] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA T.V Raman
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Jim Jewett
• Re: closing issue-30 longdesc in favor of aria-describedby [was: Consolidated issues ...] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Mark Baker
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Edward O'Connor
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Toby Inkster
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Steven Faulkner
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Jonas Sicking
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA David Bolter
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Manu Sporny
• tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] Jim Jewett
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Smylers
• meter changes [was: Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5] Jim Jewett
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Smylers
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Steven Faulkner

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

• Re: Rel="first" and "index" breaks specs and implementations Alexandre Alapetite

Wednesday, 2 September 2009

• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Lachlan Hunt
• aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] Jim Jewett
• Costs and clear guidance [was: Recording teleconferences?] Jim Jewett
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Smylers
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Thomas Broyer
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Smylers
• [Bug 7480] use of keygen should trigger a warning. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: <keygen> element Sam Ruby
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) Lars Gunther
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers James Graham
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Smylers
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Smylers
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA Anne van Kesteren
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA Steven Faulkner
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA Steven Faulkner
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-08-20 - Accessibility TF, HTML5 Test Suite, etc Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <keygen> element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm Simon Pieters
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Thomas Broyer
• Re: <keygen> element Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm Henri Sivonen
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Henri Sivonen
• Re: aria implicit roles exposed? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: aria implicit roles exposed? Steven Faulkner
• aria implicit roles exposed? Jim Jewett
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Jonas Sicking
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Toby Inkster
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Manu Sporny
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Boris Zbarsky
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: question about ARIA in HTML 5 spec text - implied use on elements not listed Ian Hickson
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Leif Halvard Silli
• Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 T.V Raman
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Aryeh Gregor
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Jonas Sicking
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Jonas Sicking
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Jonas Sicking
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Tab Atkins Jr.
• FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa Manu Sporny
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Boris Zbarsky
• RE: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Adrian Bateman
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Steven Faulkner
• Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Toby Inkster
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Steven Faulkner
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Steven Faulkner
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Smylers
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Steven Faulkner
• <video> and <audio> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Adrian Bateman
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Tab Atkins Jr.
• New <input> types (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Adrian Bateman
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Mark Baker
• <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Adrian Bateman
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Tantek Celik
• <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Adrian Bateman
• RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Adrian Bateman
• <dialog> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) Adrian Bateman
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Robin Berjon
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Steven Faulkner
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Steven Faulkner
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Robin Berjon
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Stephen Stewart
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Robin Berjon
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Robin Berjon
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Toby Inkster
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Henri Sivonen
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Bruce Lawson
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Cameron McCormack
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Toby Inkster
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Cameron McCormack
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Jonas Sicking
• RE: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Toby Inkster
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Jonas Sicking
• Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers Maciej Stachowiak
• not specifying UI [was: Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev"] Jim Jewett
• Re: ISSUE-37 - html-svg-mathml - suggest closing on 2009-08-20 Robert O'Callahan
• needed updates: RE: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Jim Jewett
• Rel="first" and "index" breaks specs and implementations Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Ian Hickson

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 23:31:00 UTC