Sunday, 31 May 2009
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- RE: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Updating the IRI spec to include "web addresses"
- <object> element
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- RE: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Updating the IRI spec to include "web addresses"
- RE: Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- RE: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- RE: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- [Bug 6766] document.all definition missing
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- RE: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- RE: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
Saturday, 30 May 2009
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- [Bug 6132] [sniffing] No whitespace before "<!DOCTYPE HTML" in content sniffing
- [Bug 6765] Poor wording in 4.8.2.1.12 General guidelines
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6764] Section 2.4.4.1 Non-negative integers - Step 9.4 refers to incorrect step
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- regrets for much of June
- RE: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- Canvas getImageData with negative size violates invariant
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- Re: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- RE: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- Re: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- [Bug 6586] Zero margin quirk not quite right
- Re: title (editorial) to scope (technical)
- Re: Design Principles
Friday, 29 May 2009
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- Content sniffing, feed readers, etc. (was HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent)
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- Web3D/X3D participation in HTML5
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies" (ACTION-123)
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies" (ACTION-123)
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- [Bug 6978] New: Mark eof-terminated script elements as malformed
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- [Bug 6586] Zero margin quirk not quite right
- Re: [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- [Bug 6977] New: Unnecessary sentence in <cite> presentation
- Re: [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- Re: [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- Re: [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Design Principles
- Meeting record: 2009-04-30 RDFa Telecon
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6760] "string" misspelled as "stirng"
- [Bug 6759] event queueing rules for <img> are nonsensical
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- [Bug 6729] Attribute getters/setters should lower case argument on HTML elements in HTML docs
- [Bug 6684] Disregard of RFC 4329 and IANA MIME Media Types
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6670] Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
Thursday, 28 May 2009
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: title (editorial) to scope (technical)
- [Bug 6586] Zero margin quirk not quite right
- RE: title (editorial) to scope (technical)
- title (editorial) => scope (technical)
- [Bug 6976] New: Image Map Example fails Validation
- Re: title (editorial) to scope (technical)
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- title (editorial) to scope (technical)
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- [Bug 6974] New: Please be explicit about inheritance of scripting flag when setting innerHTML
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- [Bug 6973] New: Support <textarea>.textLength
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- RE: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- RE: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
Wednesday, 27 May 2009
Thursday, 28 May 2009
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- RE: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- RE: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- RE: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
Wednesday, 27 May 2009
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- RE: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: Design Principles: Moving Forward (was Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft])
- Re: Design Principles: Moving Forward (was Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft])
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- RE: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages
- Events and <video controls>
- Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages
- postMessage: origin serialized too early
- Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages
- .spellcheck = 'inherit' should work
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- RE: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- RE: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6585] Rendering: <marquee bgcolor>
Tuesday, 26 May 2009
- RE: Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Re: Design Principles
- Auto-detect and encodings in HTML5
- Design Principles: Moving Forward (was Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft])
- Re: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- Re: Design Principles
- No teleconference this week
- Re: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- Re: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- RE: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- RE: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: "Outline" algorithm (document length and complexity)
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: Title of the HTML5 document
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Consistence with other specifications, was: Design Principles
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: Title of the HTML5 document
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: Centralized LinkType registries (was Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created)
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of HTML Design Principles
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of HTML Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of HTML Design Principles
- Re: Consistence with other specifications, was: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Issues with spellchecking
- Consistence with other specifications, was: Design Principles
- Re: "Outline" algorithm
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Updated Editor's Draft of HTML Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6953] clearly specify that misnested tags are an authoring-conformance error
- [Bug 6953] New: clearly specify that misnested tags are an authoring-conformance error
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Issues with spellchecking
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles (from scratch)
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Centralized LinkType registries (was Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created)
- Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Re: "Outline" algorithm
- "Outline" algorithm
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Title of the HTML5 document
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6562] Define parsing quirks
- Re: Design Principles (from scratch)
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6543] Mint a new element for figure captions
- [Bug 6516] obsolete attributes on HTMLDocument assume there is a body element
- Re: Design Principles
- [Bug 6515] the body element event handler attributes and missing Window object
- XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML
- Centralized LinkType registries (was Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created)
- Re: Issues with spellchecking
- [Bug 6461] Fix the definition of "Origin" for Documents from javascript: URLs
Monday, 25 May 2009
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: Design Principles (from scratch)
- Re: Design Principles (from scratch)
- RE: Design Principles (from scratch)
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Why publish Design Principles?
- [Bug 6457] registerContentHandler() and sniffing
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Why publish Design Principles?
- algorithmic normative conformance requirements, design principles, etc.
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Title of the HTML5 document
- Re: DC metadata
- Re: DC metadata
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- DC metadata
- Re: Title of the HTML5 document
- Re: Title of the HTML5 document
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Title of the HTML5 document
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Design Principles
- Issues with spellchecking
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- [Bug 6440] To which elements applies the formatBlock command?
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Language specification vs. user agent specification
Sunday, 24 May 2009
- Re: Language specification vs. user agent specification
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Language specification vs. user agent specification
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Language specification vs. user agent specification
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- RE: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Design Principles
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Design principles Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- RE: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- [Bug 6949] New: Don't use colon shorthand when talking about language-related attributes
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- RE: Translation control in HTML5
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: Translation control in HTML5
- Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- [Bug 6423] Names of confidence flag states inconsistent
- [Bug 6389] Avoid double parse error on EOF in DOCTYPE state
- [Bug 6351] Add event handler attributes for all events defined in HTML5
- [Bug 6350] Port examples from WF2 to HTML5
- Re: Running "Zombie" Script Elements
- RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created
- [Bug 6300] [references] reference RFC 5322 instead of RFC 2822
- [Bug 6097] [rendering] <body background> is a URL attribute?
- [Bug 5851] Consider adding .toArray() on NodeList and HTMLCollection
Saturday, 23 May 2009
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- RE: ACTION-103, was: Registering the about: URI scheme
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- RE: Running "Zombie" Script Elements
- Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: Running "Zombie" Script Elements
- Running "Zombie" Script Elements
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
Friday, 22 May 2009
- Re: fieldset: a CSS block formatting context?
- RE: "Technical specification"
- Re: "Technical specification"
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- HTML4+RDFa Test Suite available (but not reviewed)
- RE: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- RE: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- RE: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- RE: "Technical specification"
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Re: Working together on HTML5 (Re: RDFa in HTML 5)
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Working together on HTML5 (Re: RDFa in HTML 5)
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Re: RDFa in HTML 5
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Microdata e-mails
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Request to review about URI scheme
- [Bug 6942] New: Define how to handle failed 'resolve a url' steps in microdata algorithms
Thursday, 21 May 2009
- RE: Design Principles
- Re: "Technical specification"
- Re: "Technical specification"
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]
- Re: ACTION-103, was: Registering the about: URI scheme
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- Regrets for this morning's call
- Re: "Technical specification"
- Re: thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- Re: "Technical specification"
- "prior to Last Call"
- thoughts on @profile (ISSUE-55)
- "Technical specification"
- Re: toward Internet Draft for URLs in HTML 5
- Re: ACTION-103, was: Registering the about: URI scheme
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- Re: more use case evaluations
- more use case evaluations
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- [Bug 6937] New: BibTeX author and editor don't fit DRY HTML
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- RE: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- Re: Design Principles
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
- Re: Design Principles
- RE: Design Principles
- {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21
- Re: Design Principles
- RE: Design Principles
- Re: Process for proposals
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Process for proposals
- Re: Process for proposals
- Re: Process for proposals
- Re: Process for proposals
- Re: Process for proposals
- Re: <frameset onload>
- <frameset onload>
- Re: Inferring creator from vcard
- Process for proposals
- Inferring creator from vcard
- Re: Comments about microdata
- Editorial: Design principles example
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
Tuesday, 19 May 2009
- Re: RDFa in HTML (was RDFa in HTML 5)
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles
- canvas: globalAlpha should not throw
Monday, 18 May 2009
- Re: Setting document.domain
- RDFa in HTML 5
- Non-character NCRs treated differently from literal non-characters
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: Design Principles
- Design Principles
Friday, 15 May 2009
- Rendering: contenteditable
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Outline algorithm and empty sections
- Editorial: event handler attributes
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
Thursday, 14 May 2009
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- RE: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa
- getElementsByName should match any element
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
Wednesday, 13 May 2009
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-14
- Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- [Bug 6902] New: Note incompatibilities with RDF serializations
- Comments about microdata
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-14
- Re: use case focus - resending
Tuesday, 12 May 2009
- Re: use case focus - resending
- {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-14
- Re: use case focus - resending
- Re: Google's rich snippets and support for RDFa and microformats
- Re: use case focus - resending
- Re: use case focus - resending
- Re: Google's rich snippets and support for RDFa and microformats
- use case focus
- Re: use case focus - resending
- Re: use case focus - resending
- Re: use case focus - resending
- use case focus - resending
- Google's rich snippets and support for RDFa and microformats
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
Monday, 11 May 2009
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Input on the agenda
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- toward a heartbeat on authoring materials (and maybe test materials)
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- [Bug 6898] New: Case shifting terminology is confusing
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
Sunday, 10 May 2009
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- first couple of use cases
Saturday, 9 May 2009
- rel=profile also for anchor elements
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: [whatwg] Helping people seaching for content filtered by license
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: [whatwg] Helping people seaching for content filtered by license
- Re: ACTION-103, was: Registering the about: URI scheme
- [Bug 6894] New: add statement that the "checked" attribute on <input> is a boolean attribute
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: ACTION-103, was: Registering the about: URI scheme
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
Friday, 8 May 2009
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: [whatwg] microdata use cases and Getting data out of poorly written Web pages
- Re: ACTION-103, was: Registering the about: URI scheme
Thursday, 7 May 2009
- Re: toward Internet Draft for URLs in HTML 5
- Re: toward Internet Draft for URLs in HTML 5
- Re: Reparsing of comments, escaped text spans, and --!>
- Re: Parsing: "<" inside tags
- Re: Parsing: "<" inside tags
- <section><hgroup><h1><h2> styling
Wednesday, 6 May 2009
- Re: <style @src>
- Re: Parsing: "<" inside tags
- Parsing: "<" inside tags
- {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-07
- Re: Media elements may never load, may load the wrong source, etc
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
- Re: <style @src>
- Re: Times, dates, and related topics
- Re: Times, dates, and related topics
- Re: <style @src>
- Re: <style @src>
- Re: <style @src> (was: <link> and <param> in SVG)
- Events on window
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- <style @src> (was: <link> and <param> in SVG)
Monday, 4 May 2009
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of summary for tabular data
- Re: Accesskey issues
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Accesskey issues
- Re: Comments on Timers
Sunday, 3 May 2009
- Re: Times, dates, and related topics
- accesskey=""
- Footnotes and sectioning roots. <figure> and <table>
Saturday, 2 May 2009
- Re: Times, dates, and related topics
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- [ISSUE-41] Namespaces in HTML
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: Selectors, getElementsByTagName() and camelCase SVG
Friday, 1 May 2009
- Re: Selectors, getElementsByTagName() and camelCase SVG
- Re: MathML in HTML: syntax for hypertext links
- Re: <body>foo</h1>bar
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: Selectors, getElementsByTagName() and camelCase SVG
- Re: Naming of <header>
- Re: Translation control in HTML5
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- RE: Translation control in HTML5
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors
- Re: Translation control in HTML5
- RE: Translation control in HTML5
- Re: Translation control in HTML5
- Re: Naming of <header>
- [Bug 6858] New: More details needed for "ASCII-compatible encoding"
- Re: <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- <link> and <param> in SVG (SVG ACTION-2534)
- Re: Firing media events early for throttled downloads
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors