public-html@w3.org from December 2009 by date

Thursday, 31 December 2009

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Julian Reschke
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Julian Reschke
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer

Wednesday, 30 December 2009

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Chris Double
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Toby Inkster
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Leif Halvard Silli

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Edward O'Connor
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Mark Nottingham
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Julian Reschke
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Laura Carlson
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video John Foliot
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor

Monday, 28 December 2009

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Edward O'Connor
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Jonas Sicking
• AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Jeremy Keith
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Julian Reschke
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

Sunday, 27 December 2009

• [Bug 8554] <progress> element should be labelable with a label bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 8555] Remove the Meter Element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Saturday, 26 December 2009

• [Bug 8552] Remove the Progress Element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 25 December 2009

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Robert O'Callahan

Thursday, 24 December 2009

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Karl Dubost
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Karl Dubost
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Gavin Carothers
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 22 December 2009

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Mike Taylor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Kornel
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video L. David Baron
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video Simon Pieters
• Public feedback on HTML5 video Gavin Carothers

Friday, 18 December 2009

• Re: Comments about the ACTION-165 draft Laura Carlson
• Comments about the ACTION-165 draft Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal Laura Carlson
• minutes: html5 a11y task force canvas sub group telecon minutes 2009-12-17 [draft] Gregory J. Rosmaita

Thursday, 17 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: FW: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content Ian Hickson
• Re: FW: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal Charles McCathieNevile
• FW: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content Paul Cotton
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Sam Ruby
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 16 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Toby Inkster
• Re: WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Henri Sivonen
• Re: X3D comments in Bug 8238. Don Brutzman
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Paul Cotton
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Leif Halvard Silli

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-17: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces Paul Cotton
• Minutes HTML WG 10 December 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ian Hickson
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Joe D Williams
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-67 h:tml-parsing-dom - extended to 2010-01-07 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-59 normative-language-reference extended to 2010-01-07 Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Paul Cotton
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Toby Inkster
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Joe D Williams
• Selectedness when adding options (was: Re: Setting selectedIndex before adding option with that index) Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Setting selectedIndex before adding option with that index Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Henri Sivonen
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Toby Inkster
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Leif Halvard Silli

Monday, 14 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Aryeh Gregor
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ennals, Robert
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Toby Inkster
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ennals, Robert
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ennals, Robert
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ennals, Robert
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Benjamin Nowack
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Manu Sporny

Sunday, 13 December 2009

• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Joe D Williams
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: HTML WG issues scheduled to close Dec 17 comments Maciej Stachowiak
• HTML WG issues scheduled to close Dec 17 comments Larry Masinter

Saturday, 12 December 2009

• New UI for HTML5 Table Inspector Ben Millard
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Joe D Williams
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Larry Masinter
• RE: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS Larry Masinter
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ennals, Robert
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Toby Inkster

Friday, 11 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Martin McEvoy
• Re: WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML Arun Ranganathan
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ennals, Robert
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Roy T. Fielding
• Features beyond HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections Shelley Powers
• [Bug 8450] Case insensitivity of @rel vs case sensitivity of URIs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 8476] <canvas> contexts bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Manu Sporny
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Joe D Williams
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate Roy T. Fielding
• ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? Ennals, Robert

Thursday, 10 December 2009

• WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML Arun Ranganathan
• Re: X3D comments in Bug 8238. rita Turkowski
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed Shelley Powers
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed Shelley Powers
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed Ian Hickson
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed Shelley Powers
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals Matt May
• reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals Matt May
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 9 December 2009

• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 4): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 3): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification Manu Sporny
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Manu Sporny
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Sam Ruby
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Shelley Powers
• Issues and Change Proposals Status list updated Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-63: origin-req-scope - Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-7: video-codecs - Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Sam Ruby
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Sam Ruby
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Manu Sporny
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Manu Sporny
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element Steven Faulkner
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms Ian Hickson
• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms Thomas Broyer
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms Ric Hardacre
• Re: Inconsistent |typeof HTMLCanvasElement| Patrick Garies
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Jonas Sicking
• ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 3): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.

Tuesday, 8 December 2009

• CfC: Close ISSUE-73 predefined-voc (ends 2009-12-17) Maciej Stachowiak
• CfC: Close ISSUE-59 normative-language-reference (ends 2009-12-17) Maciej Stachowiak
• CfC: Close ISSUE-67 h:tml-parsing-dom (ends 2009-12-17) Maciej Stachowiak
• CfC: Close ISSUE-35 aria-processing (ends 2009-12-17) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification John Foliot
• Plan to resolve ISSUE-76 RDFa / Microdata Maciej Stachowiak
• Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Path forward on Microdata Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Path forward on Microdata Maciej Stachowiak
• http content type authoritative for object data? Julian Reschke
• Re: Path forward on Microdata Manu Sporny
• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms Philip Taylor
• Ability to submit invalid forms Ric Hardacre
• Re: Inconsistent |typeof HTMLCanvasElement| Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Martin McEvoy
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 2): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification Manu Sporny
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Tab Atkins Jr.

Monday, 7 December 2009

• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Kornel Lesinski
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Martin McEvoy
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Toby Inkster
• Decision Process (Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5)) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Shelley Powers
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Sam Ruby
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Shelley Powers
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Sam Ruby
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Shelley Powers
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Sam Ruby
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Shelley Powers
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Sam Ruby
• Path forward on Microdata Maciej Stachowiak
• Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Julian Reschke
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Shelley Powers
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Shelley Powers
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Ian Hickson
• [Bug 8449] Remove extraneous material from Table section bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 8447] Tighter definition on the aside element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Sunday, 6 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Inconsistent |typeof HTMLCanvasElement| Patrick Garies
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Julian Reschke
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Maciej Stachowiak
• CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) Roy T. Fielding

Saturday, 5 December 2009

• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Shelley Powers
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Jens Meiert
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely Shelley Powers
• Dropping Microdata entirely Shelley Powers
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Shelley Powers

Friday, 4 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tim van Oostrom
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tim van Oostrom

Saturday, 5 December 2009

• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Julian Reschke
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.

Friday, 4 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: discussions of HTML6 Shelley Powers
• Re: discussions of HTML6 T.V Raman
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Manu Sporny
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• RE: discussions of HTML6 Dailey, David P.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: discussions of HTML6 Shelley Powers
• Re: discussions of HTML6 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: discussions of HTML6 Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: discussions of HTML6 David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Sam Ruby
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5, was: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• discussions of HTML6 Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Jirka Kosek
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Ian Hickson
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Jirka Kosek
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification James Graham
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) L. David Baron
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Change proposal: Adding a sprite attribute to img tags Patrick Garies
• Re: Change proposal: Adding a sprite attribute to img tags Roy T. Fielding
• Change proposal: Adding a sprite attribute to img tags David Calhoun
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Minutes HTML WG 3 December 2009 Michael Cooper
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Aryeh Gregor

Thursday, 3 December 2009

• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification James Graham
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification James Graham
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Sam Ruby
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Laura Carlson
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element Steven Faulkner
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Michael(tm) Smith
• [Entities-last-call] - htmlmath entities collection David Carlisle
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification James Graham
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration Lachlan Hunt
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Julian Reschke
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Toby Inkster
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Mark Baker
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 2 December 2009

• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Maciej Stachowiak
• ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Ian Hickson
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details Shelley Powers
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Larry Masinter
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

• RE: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS Larry Masinter
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• RE: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Table Summary Cynthia Shelly
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Ian Hickson
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Jeroen van der Gun
• [Bug 5821] meta/@scheme missing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Table Summary Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Steve Axthelm
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Steve Axthelm
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Nick Fitzsimons
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Param Joe D Williams
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Nick Fitzsimons
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Laura Carlson
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Julian Reschke
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Tab Atkins Jr.
• Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists Shelley Powers
• Re: ARIA roles added to the a element should be conforming in HTML5. Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) David Carlisle
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Toby Inkster
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Jirka Kosek
• DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) Larry Masinter

Last message date: Thursday, 31 December 2009 21:19:12 UTC